Los Angeles Kings Rumours
Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.
21 Oct 2016 05:06:09
Kings trade: Adrian Kempe
Flyers trade Mason or Neuvirth and a 3rd round pick
Jets trade: Trouba
Philly trades:. Sanheim, MacDonald, Mason and a 1st round pick
This trade could be completely off for two reasons. First is I've never made a trade with a cap dump so value might be off. Second, I don't watch/ follow the jets enough to know if they could use a goalie, or if theirs are good.
21 Oct 2016 06:19:41
They don't need a goalie.
21 Oct 2016 11:17:37
Kings haven't moved Kempe in the past and I doubt they move him now.
23 Oct 2016 04:52:15
Sanheim > Trouba.
23 Oct 2016 08:38:50
kempe for mason (with salary retained) maybe.
18 Oct 2016 21:57:06
Washington Capitals Trades:
(G) Philipp Grubauer
2018 6th Round Pick
Los Angeles Kings Trade:
2017 2nd Round Pick
*Kings acquire a stopgap goalie to take Quicks place for 3-4 months, while paying the price of a pick; to roll a Grubauer-Zatkoff tandem over a Zatkoff-Budaj tandem.
Washington Capitals Trade:
2017 4th Round Pick
Edmonton Oilers Trade:
*Edmonton acquires a pick in order to trade a player who really wasn't needed, considering L. B in the farm system.
Why does Washington do all of this?
Grubauer is better than Gustavsson, don't get me wrong, but the Kings need a semi-decent goalie, so that's why I'd suggest them going after Grubauer instead of Jonas Gustavsson. That said, I think Washington should make this deal, as really Philipp Grubauer SHOULD be one of the three goalies taken by Las Vegas in the expansion draft (right now I'd say either Pickard/ Varlamov, Grubauer and Matt Murray/ Marc-Andre Fleury if their issue isn't resolved) . They should trade him while he has value, instead of losing him for nothing to Vegas. They still get a reliable backup, and really, Gustavssson isn't going to be in more than 15 games with Holtby holding the mound, so really, even if his record is like 6-8-1, the Caps wouldn't have to worry. (although i think itd be more like 8-5-2).
Basically Caps Trade:
4th Round Pick
6th Round Pick
in exchange for.
2nd Round Pick
I don't think that's too far-fetched. Thoughts?
18 Oct 2016 22:03:21
Wow. I go away for a second and then its posted. Poof, fastest I've ever seen.
19 Oct 2016 00:21:11
No from Caps. They'll keep Grubby.
19 Oct 2016 05:15:10
If they wanted the monster then they could have easily just signed him then. No from caps.
19 Oct 2016 08:07:42
Why does everyone keep thinking the Oilers have a 2nd? Smh.
17 Oct 2016 15:17:44
Kings Get: Ben Bishop
Lightning Get: Jack Campbell, Michael Mersch, Kevin Gravel, Adrian Kempe, Nick Ebert.
17 Oct 2016 16:27:12
a pile of scraps for an excellent goalie. nice.
Hint: 5 for 1 trades are never good.
17 Oct 2016 16:33:51
The Kings don't have Ebert anymore.
17 Oct 2016 18:01:13
Just curious why there is a 'believable' vote here. Only time 5 AHL players were traded for 1 NHL player I can think of was last season when the leafs sent 5 guys that were never going to make the next step, to the islanders for grabner. They took on an overpaid 3rd liner who's offense had dried up in exchange for roster spot flexibility. Never going to happen for a Goalie who has been in the vezina conversation for 3 straight years.
17 Oct 2016 18:16:45
1) It's 5 AHL prospects, not random players
2) Grabner is actually a very good all-round player.
17 Oct 2016 18:25:31
Why would the Lightning do this lol. Plus Kings can't afford Bishop.
17 Oct 2016 18:43:29
I guess speaks to the weakness of LAK farm system. Michael Mersch, Kevin Gravel and Adrian Kempe are 3 of LAK top 5 prospects.
17 Oct 2016 19:17:58
Exactly. How is that + 2 other prospects not enough for Bishop?
17 Oct 2016 20:34:12
I don't think gretzkyghost was complimenting the trade, more pointing out how weak the Kings prospect pool is. Tampa has bishop, Tyler Johnson, drouin, palat all on expiring contracts and have been so close to the cup twice. They need to go for it now. Trading a great goalie for 3 mediocre prospects and 2 plugs doesn't get them closer, but knocks them much further away.
17 Oct 2016 20:45:25
Shankar remember garbner.
17 Oct 2016 21:33:48
because it's not. Getting 3 of a top 5 means nothing as it tells you nothing of the strength of the top 5 in relation to the rest of the league. You have to be able to understand this without me spelling it out for you. Don't be stupid.
17 Oct 2016 21:56:09
he shanks stop being a huge "helmet"
17 Oct 2016 22:48:21
Kempe is pretty good though isn't he? But yeah obviously not going to happen.
17 Oct 2016 23:51:29
Leafs traded Kessell for scraps.
18 Oct 2016 01:10:19
Mersch, Kempe and Gravel are argueably 3 of LA's top 5 prospects. Even if Quick is out for the season going after Bishop wouldn't make much sense.
17 Oct 2016 12:51:06
Has anyone heard of a Pavelic to the Kings rumor?
17 Oct 2016 14:06:15
Nope. And if Quick somehow ends up out for the year, they won't settle for Pavelec. They'll take a much bigger name like Bishop or Fleury.
17 Oct 2016 14:58:46
Why would they pay the price for Bishop or Fluery? Pavalec would be a good option.
17 Oct 2016 15:24:31
^ @hugecaosfan what do they do at the end of the year when they give away a top goalie for nothing to the expansion team.
17 Oct 2016 17:40:15
Bishop is a a pending free agent anyway. So you can consider him as what in baseball they call a "rental. " Then they can protect Quick.
17 Oct 2016 18:17:24
How is Pavelec a good option? He got sent to the minors by Winnepeg. Tough to do these days.
17 Oct 2016 18:48:17
Acquiring Bishop would essentially allow them to compete this year while not affecting their future in goal. That being said with no inclination to resign him i'm not sure what they would be willing to give.
17 Oct 2016 19:18:47
Because they only need a goalie for 1 year. Quick will be back next year. Bishop only has 1 year left on his contract.
17 Oct 2016 19:38:35
LA may need a quality goalie if Quick decides to go the surgery route over rehab. Bishop would be a good option to go after but when weighing in the question of the cost, it would be HIGH for LA. Why? Consider this: it's already known that Yzerman is weighing keeping Bishop and letting him walk or trading him for assets. TB is going to be a strong playoff contender this season so that's not an easy choice. To make the decision to move him this early in the season would require a very good return in spite of his UFA status. Add to that the fact that LA would be reaching out almost in desperation, TB is at an obvious advantage in this situation. If I were TB and actually decided upon making that trade, I'd be asking for Enroth, LA's top prospect, and a mid-round pick for Bishop and a late pick. And if that doesn't work for LA, well, then Bishop helps TB reach the playoffs and maybe win the Cup this year. TB holds all the cards in this situation.
That said, I don't see it working for either team regardless. Too expensive for LA, and too early for TB to move Bishop.
17 Oct 2016 20:12:51
Chirp is completely right. Bishop would be nice for LA, but he will cost them too much to acquire him. For all the goalies that are considered to be on the "block", Pavelec is the best option for LA.
17 Oct 2016 20:22:30
Pavalec isn't needed in Winnipeg but he can still keep a good team afloat. But Quick is out for a full season? I didn't know that.
17 Oct 2016 21:10:28
He's the right guy to lead them to 8th in the division. You are 100% right on that.
17 Oct 2016 22:10:45
You can ask for Enroth but he plays for the leafs.
17 Oct 2016 22:37:21
Pavalec has never had a cup contending team in front of him. could be interesting.
18 Oct 2016 00:17:26
lol @ JF12, Pavelec has barely had a playoff team in front of him.
18 Oct 2016 00:37:50
HA! Good catch, Leafs17. I'm living In the past. Haha.
Darn you smart leafs fans. Both of you. :P
Kuemper outta Minne seems like the next best bet by my thoughts. He's played NHL, he's semi-proven, he would be cheap. Could see Martinez and a late pick for Kuemper and a 2-3rnder.
18 Oct 2016 12:29:52
About the team in front of Pavelec, he made it to the playoffs with them a few years ago, so it's hard to say that.
18 Oct 2016 13:00:32
How about Howard from the Red Wings?
16 Oct 2016 03:55:44
L. A. Kings trades
Conditional 4th round pick in 2017 (becomes a 3rd if Pavalec plays 25 games)
Pavalec with 50% retained.
16 Oct 2016 03:05:08
The Los Angeles Kings have inquired about Winnipeg Jets goaltender Ondrej Pavelec.
They couldn't select Pavelec off waivers due to the associated cost, and will have to dump salary to get the deal done.
Pavelec currently carries a $3.9 million cap hit, while the Kings have about $1.5 million to play with.
15 Oct 2016 01:12:20
With Quick potentially need surgery and out 3/ 4 Months I propose the Canucks could help out the Kings.
-Ryan Miller (50% retained)
Canucks tank for Nolan Patrick and Kings get a goalie to stay competitive. Let's be real, without Quick this season is lost for LA.
15 Oct 2016 09:05:27
I don't know if Miller will be the answer.
15 Oct 2016 15:30:18
Miller is past his prime. He'd be an improvement over Zatkoff and Budaj, but I'd rather either get a big fish like Bishop or keep the goaltending the same and have a bad season.
15 Oct 2016 18:09:19
Kings also have 0 need for Bishop when Quick is still on the team. I'm sure they will be fine for however long Quick is out.
08 Oct 2016 14:12:43
Boston Bruins Trade:
Los Angeles Kings Trade:
2017 4th Round Pick
Boston gets a d-man who could play top 4, LA gets a serviceable top 9 guy who could slide up if needed.
Idk bout value tbh, just thought that this kinda fits team needs for both. Improvements?
08 Oct 2016 15:17:04
Don't think the Kings would want Hayes contract.
08 Oct 2016 17:10:45
We need McNabb more than we need Hayes. I mean the value is similar, but the D corps in LA is not good enough where we can be giving up D-men that we need.
08 Oct 2016 19:17:29
Jimmy Hayes is worth the 4th. Take out McNabb.
08 Oct 2016 20:54:00
Thx for comments, was basing hayes' value off of the smith trade, but gheez, if hayes' value has dropped that significantly, boston lost that smith trade by quite a bit.
07 Oct 2016 21:17:54
Los Angeles Kings Trade:
2017 2nd Round Pick
Tampa Bay Lightning Trade:
Kucherov - Kopitar - Gaborik
Pearson - Carter - Purcell
Brown - Shore - Kempe
Clifford - Lewis - King
Killorn - Stamkos - Toffoli
Drouin - Johnson - Palat
Namestnikov - Filppula - Callahan
Paquette - Boyle - Condra
Kucherov > Toffoli
07 Oct 2016 21:51:07
NO! NO! NO!
07 Oct 2016 21:51:17
07 Oct 2016 22:54:38
Aren't toffoli and Kucherov almost indentical?
08 Oct 2016 01:02:02
Kucherov > Toffoli.
08 Oct 2016 01:27:54
Kucherov gets slightly more points but Toffoli has a strong two way game.
07 Oct 2016 13:37:42
Detroit needs cap space and the Kings need a top 9 forward because of injuries and suspensions.
Det: Tomas Jurco
LAK: 2017 5th, and 2018 6th
Det: Teemu Pulkinnen
LAK: 2017 4th and 2018 6th
It seems Detroit does not value them enough to put them in the lineup consistently and they'll risk losing them for nothing if they decide to put em waivers. Idk if this would be their values, but LA could really use some top 9 (or at least potential top 9) forwards.
07 Oct 2016 13:59:10
Detroit doesn't seem to value them that highly, but they could definitely fetch a bit more than that I would think.
07 Oct 2016 14:12:17
I think both players could get a better offer.
07 Oct 2016 15:33:37
Ok yeah I definintely can't tell what the heck their values are. I mean if u guys say they could both get higher values, like just a 3rd round pick for one of em?
07 Oct 2016 18:41:53
I'm saying a 3rd for one or a 2nd for both is fair.
11 Sep 2016 17:03:31
Leafs and kings
Leafs trade lupal holland 4th
Kings brown pearson and 1st
This trade salary wise is close
Kings get lupal who If healthy can help them or they can ltir him and have the cap space
Holland would fit in there bottom 6 nicely
Kings save 4 years on brown contract after lupals is up
Tor takes 6 years of brown yes but in the rebuild he could be a leader play bottom 6 and after a few years leafs can buy him out the last 2 years
Leafs get a good young forward in pearson who would help them this year and could make it easier to trade jvr for a dman that could them this year
And a 1st it be late but that's just a sweenter for the leafs taking brown on
Leafs fans won't like this I am a leafs fan and believe they could use a leader like brown that has won the cup plays hard even tho he isn't that skilled or fast but could be a great leader for them.
11 Sep 2016 19:32:40
I get your thoughts here but I think Kings just suck up Browns contract or if they were willing to include Pearson and a first with brown, someone might take it without having to take lupul back.
11 Sep 2016 19:34:30
Easy no from the Kings man. Holland and Lupul are worth nothing.
11 Sep 2016 19:34:48
I wish man no from Kings.
11 Sep 2016 20:08:59
Agree with Jim.
11 Sep 2016 21:26:57
This is absolutely brutal for LA. In what universe did you actually think Lupul and Holland are worth that much. Bruh. And you said you don't think Leafs fans would like this trade? Are you serious. Come on Mike you're better than that.
11 Sep 2016 22:42:34
Ya I just got home and read it over was a pretty bad effort on my behave.
11 Sep 2016 22:42:53
12 Sep 2016 00:08:23
Why would my team give up a 1st for Lupul and Holland?
06 Sep 2016 01:56:22
Leafs: Nazem Kadri, 2nd
Wild: Erik Haula, Matt Dumba
Leafs: Tyler Bozak
Hurricanes: Viktor Stalberg
Leafs: Leo Komarov
Oilers: Nail Yakupov, Anton Lander
Leafs: Milan Michalek, Colin Greening
Flames: Michael Ferland, Dennis Wideman
Leafs: Garrett Sparks, Jeremy Bracco, Brendan Leipsic, 2nd
Stars: Cody Eakin, Valeri Nichushkin
Leafs: Martin Marincin
Coyotes: Jarred Tinordi
Leafs: Joffrey Lupul
Kings: Dustin Brown
Van Riemsdyk - Matthews - Nichushkin
Nylander - Haula - Marner
Brown - Eakin - Yakupov
Ferland - Laich - Shoshnikov
Hunwick - Reilly
Zaitsev - Dumba
Polak - Wideman.
06 Sep 2016 12:47:34
Most easy nos from not Toronto.
06 Sep 2016 15:20:31
And a no from Edmonton as well.
06 Sep 2016 15:54:28
Most easy nos from the other teams, especially the Calgary one.
06 Sep 2016 17:48:26
I'd consider the Oilers trade because i like the style Komarov plays, but then again I think Oilers would rather get a dman and not another forward.
06 Sep 2016 18:35:38
Bozak for Stalberg?
06 Sep 2016 18:41:31
Some good proposals here. A couple, like the Brown one would be intriguing. Unfortunately, his contract is just too crippling.
06 Sep 2016 19:36:59
The easiest no is from common sense lol 7 trades to remake a whole roster and the only true value the leafs gave up was kadri. Komorov also, but a heart and soul over tangible numbers type. Like the passion but not possible.
06 Sep 2016 00:08:45
LA Kings trade Dustin Brown to Toronto Maple Leafs for Joffrey Lupul, 6th.
06 Sep 2016 10:51:24
Oh nvm lol stupid hoax
06 Sep 2016 11:11:50
Harambe didn't die for this, c'mon man.
02 Sep 2016 19:32:11
Los Angeles: Muzzin.
03 Sep 2016 00:15:02
No from LA.
03 Sep 2016 00:20:29
No way from LA.
03 Sep 2016 01:14:49
Even tho Trouba is younger and may turn out better than Muzzin, there's no way LA will separate Muzzin and Doughty. That won't happen.
03 Sep 2016 02:37:27
Good idea but this trade would never happen.
22 Aug 2016 17:52:24
Rumours that RD collegiate Matt Benning could be inked by the Oilers, Canucks or Kings as early as today. His numbers are comparable to NHL regulars and could be a good steady top 6 option in the future as well as a RD towards the farm team.
22 Aug 2016 18:54:03
I heard he's a devastating hitter too lol.
22 Aug 2016 19:17:13
Jim Benning signs Matt Benning? Lol wasn't this guy drafted like 5-6 years ago by Boston?
22 Aug 2016 20:00:24
Man i'd love it.
Right handed shot, good hitter and was born in Edmonton.
22 Aug 2016 20:09:16
Hope LA signs him.
22 Aug 2016 22:34:54
Doesn't Edmonton have enough 5-6 defenseman?
22 Aug 2016 23:42:00
You can almost never have enough depth.
You can't predict how many players will get injured and who will turn out to be a diamond in the rough.
Especially because defenceman take longer to develop you never know.
23 Aug 2016 00:30:28
When there not paid 3.5 million then I agree Tyson.
05 Aug 2016 23:02:07
Re-posting a trade I saw the other day that I thought was interesting.
- Derrik Pouliot
Kings trade :
- Tanner Pearson
06 Aug 2016 00:50:23
I mean we could really use Pouliot, it's just that we need scoring and Pearson's improved every season and I'm expecting around 45-50 points next season and that could be to valuable to give up.
06 Aug 2016 02:11:55
Don't like this trade.
Because Lucic left The Kings could use all of their left wingers. And Tanner Pearson has been improving every season according to KingLover.
06 Aug 2016 02:13:24
Would that work cap wise? Also I think the pens need the defence more than the scoring, and I think la needs the scoring more than the d.
06 Aug 2016 02:19:50
I mean I'd do it if we got a guarantee from like a FA like Jori Hudler that he'd sign with us to replace Pears, but Idk.
06 Aug 2016 04:59:18
With the departure of Lucic and Brown declining even further Pearson is definitely more valuable to the kings in my eyes.
06 Aug 2016 05:21:16
You stole this trade.
06 Aug 2016 05:21:31
It was on HF Boards.
06 Aug 2016 05:42:10
Read my first sentence again. Nice try though buddy. Keep posting your Nylander for Lindholm trades haha.
06 Aug 2016 05:57:27
That's not even bad tho.
06 Aug 2016 06:07:03
I agree it's not bad, for the leafs. Terrible for ducks.
06 Aug 2016 17:13:08
So your saying that if Lindholm was on the Carolina Hurricanes deep D Corps and Toronto offered the Future 30 goal scorer you think the canes would Decline? It's not a bad trade in terms of pure value. Maybe in positional needs tho.
06 Aug 2016 19:45:39
Yeah the value is there but Penguins should probably keep Pouliot as they need D not forwards.
05 Aug 2016 19:07:05
IMO with Hudler still on the market I think the Kings should swipe him up cheaply with there lack of depth on the LW.
So here's my proposals
Sign Hudler to a 1 year 1.5 mil contract.
Then trade Rob Scudari to the the jets for a 7th round pick. He'd be pretty good on there bottom pair.
05 Aug 2016 19:31:53
nobody wants rob scuderi.
05 Aug 2016 19:44:20
Colts right we really only brought Scuds back for sentimental value. And as of now LA would have the cap space to sign Hidler as they have 1.7 in space so we can keep Scuds as well. Hudler may command a little more than 1.5 though.
05 Aug 2016 19:44:36
He's still better then Shatenkurk at defense.
05 Aug 2016 20:08:25
Didn't Scudrari retire?
05 Aug 2016 20:11:58
Hudler I read is waiting after vesey is signed cause there is teams he wants to go to that are waiting to see if they get vesey. And I'm sure he'll get 1.5 mil for 1 year.
05 Aug 2016 20:13:59
That's a pretty good deal to get Hudler considering how damn good he was two seasons ago. Idk how he hasn't been picked up yet but if any team can get him for that low of price that'll be a steal.
05 Aug 2016 21:03:29
Meant more than 1.5mil.
05 Aug 2016 21:58:43
Bardown Scuderi is aweful and doesn't even rank in top 60 but yeah better than shatty who ranks top 30 keep up your biased rants and you stupid trades. You lose credibility by the post.
05 Aug 2016 23:06:03
Scuderi was a pylon last year. He's old and getting slower and worse. He's had a respectable career but he's nothing more then an AHL top 4 option at this stage in his career.
05 Aug 2016 23:37:31
Jets have AHL dmen better than Scuderi. A few of them. As for Hudler, I think he is waiting for a specific location or two, otherwise I think he would have signed a month ago. i'm sure he has seen some decent offers money-wise but that at this point of his career that isn't his priority.
06 Aug 2016 02:42:16
Shatenkurk is more of a ECHL star or a AHL call up not really a NHL player.
06 Aug 2016 05:02:48
I'd say Hudler could get around 2.5-3m if not more depending on the interest in him, scoring winger that can play both sides like him should be considered a good pickup. If anything whoever signs him can just trade him at the deadline for pick/ prospects if things don't go as planned.
05 Aug 2016 16:24:38
Toronto: William Nylander
Anaheim: Hampus Lindholm
I took this Idiea from KingsLover I think it Benefits both teams. Toronto gets a young top Dman and just Imagine Nylander with Getzlaf and Perry.
05 Aug 2016 17:07:45
Try marner +
05 Aug 2016 17:37:59
American Tank I wouldn't trade Marner for anyone on the Ducks.
05 Aug 2016 18:01:29
Nylander won't get Lindholm straight up. I don't think the Ducks would be interested in a gaggle of c/ d prospects or older overpaid 4th liners either.
05 Aug 2016 18:12:52
I think that's a little crazy if you wouldn't want to trade Marner for "anyone" on the ducks, but I would forsure try and trade Nylander before Marner.
05 Aug 2016 19:35:57
Yah McJesus I meant I'd want to see what he turns into it'd take a crazy over payment like Johnny Hockey.
05 Aug 2016 20:15:56
Yeah for sure.
05 Aug 2016 21:02:27
I'm sorry but Bardown Beauty your proposals got to be some of the worst ideas I've seen on this site.
05 Aug 2016 21:05:04
Leafs won't give up their top prospects. They're rebuilding, they are going to build from within their organization. Makes no sense to swap players like this.
05 Aug 2016 22:30:25
BJ I'm going to stick up for him on this one, atleast its not the usual 7 for 2 proposals, and he's actually got some good pieces going both ways. I'd rather have Lindholm anyday over Nylander, yeah, but atleast its Nylander and not kapanen 2 2nd round picks Hunwick and the other usuals.
05 Aug 2016 23:23:11
If you wanna stick up for him that's fine. Just read his other proposals, I don't need to say anything else. Nylander for Lindholm is not even close. May as well just put Kappanen for Fowler. I agree at least it's not the classic quantity for quality trade but still.
06 Aug 2016 01:53:18
lindholm is a stud and marner is highly skilled but undersized and hasn't played agame in the nhl yet
as for nylander its not even close.
06 Aug 2016 02:52:00
BJ Nylander=Joulevi in terms of value do you agree with that at least because I think either A. Underrate B. Hate the Leafs or C. Overvalue Lindholm.
Also I try and make my trades Far fetched block buster deals with both teams giving good value.
26 Jul 2016 02:44:14
Toronto: JVR and Josh Lievo
Anahiem: 2017 1st and 2018 1st
Toronto: JVR and Valiev
Islanders: Dal Colle, Sorkin and 2017 2nd
Minnasota: Dumba and 2nd
Toronto: JVR and 2nd
Kings: Tyler Toffli
Montreal: Mccaron, Fucal and 2nd 2017
Toronto: JVR and Polak (Deadline Deal)
Ottawa: Cici and 2nd
Flyers: Sanhiem and 2nd
Washington: Marcus Johannson and Ilya Samsonov
JVR dosent really fit the Leafs age sense he will be heading somewhere else in 2 years because he dosent fit into Toronto. The May as well just trade him for Max value.
26 Jul 2016 04:33:44
Id do the Montreal trade, wouldn't be easy to play against McCarron on the Leafs but that LW hole needs to be filled.
26 Jul 2016 05:53:21
Samsonov won't be getting traded from Caps, but JVR could be pretty dope on Capitals and could really give them that extra push for the cup.
26 Jul 2016 07:12:14
McJesus who would caps add instead then?
26 Jul 2016 07:36:51
I personally don't think they wanna get rid of Johansson, so I don't know who else I would include. I still think JVR should stay on leafs idk why nobody wants him anymore.
But idk let's just keep what you had. Maybe Jo + O'Brien or a different B prospect. And I say B because i still don't think they would want to trade away Johansson. But they definitely won't be trading away a top goalie prospect throughout the whole league, that's too much/ they won't trade him.
26 Jul 2016 09:04:45
Absolutely no chance JVR could get Toffoli. Toffolli is younger and already almost as good as JVR.
26 Jul 2016 09:23:51
In fact I'd argue he's just as good right now if anyone's up for it lol.
26 Jul 2016 11:18:27
Toffoli is far and away better than JVR.
26 Jul 2016 11:18:27
Toffoli is far and away better than JVR.
26 Jul 2016 14:33:23
Barddownbeauty why do you think the Leafs would want to trade JVR to anyone? Do you know something that no one else knows about JVR that is the reason he is being peddled at least 5 times a day on this site? If he is that expendable why would other teams want him unless they can steal him for a 2nd round pick. I'm not knocking any of your trade proposals, I'm just curious as to why is he Leaf nations go to trade player? I and many others that post replies, don't believe he is worth as much as leaf fans think he is.
26 Jul 2016 17:32:30
No way you get Toff for JVR based off age and the fact that JVR will walk in 2 years.
26 Jul 2016 22:26:38
Because JVR has a lot of value and is a UFA in 2 years IslandJet the leafs don't need him.
16 Jun 2016 18:29:03
Tyson Barrie is no longer on the trade block : ( Joe Sakic stated. And also Kopitar was named the captain of the LA Kings which I think was a really good move by the team.
Anyways, other confirmed news is Flames making hard case for Fluery, and Penguins not offering Schultz a contract.
That's it from your daily news man, McJesus.
16 Jun 2016 18:41:13
Also Ward signed with Carolina.
16 Jun 2016 18:50:07
Not buying Barrie off the market, Avs said a very similar thing about O'Reilly and he ended up trading, this could be an attempted to raise his value.
16 Jun 2016 19:04:15
Sakic was pretty adamant about Barrie staying with the Avs but i guess anything can happen, if they get a good deal then why not trade him right?
16 Jun 2016 21:32:13
Cam Ward did resign with Canes? I read yesterday they were talking about a 2 or 3 year deal. It's done now? What's the Term and $$?
16 Jun 2016 21:50:15
Only way I could see Fleury being shipped out is for Wideman+ cause Calgary would have to move some big $$$ out.
16 Jun 2016 22:00:38
Yep. Ward resigns for 1 years $3.3M per year. That's almost just what I wanted Oilers to try and get him for. Damn.
16 Jun 2016 22:28:54
5.6 for 2 years?
I honestly can't remember the money but it's 2 year and it was like 3.something mil per year.
16 Jun 2016 23:02:57
3,5 m this year and 3,1 M the next.
17 Jun 2016 04:23:28
I think the GM and the coach or in disagreement about Barrie, Sakic likes him because he is a good young player, probably their best d-man, but Roy for some weird reason hates him.