NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


Itookdonscherry's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Itookdonscherry's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Itookdonscherry's Posts



To Itookdonscherry's last 5 rumours posts


To Itookdonscherry's last 5 talk posts


To Itookdonscherry's last 5 rumour replies


Itookdonscherry's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Itookdonscherry's rumours posts


20 Jan 2018 22:48:48
To Winnipeg - JVR and Carrick/Polak

To Toronto - Myers

Why? For Winnipeg. Getting JVR would allow them to put Perrault where he seems to play better on the 3rd line and they can put JVR with Little and Ehlers who can play both wings.

For Toronto. Put Myers with Gardiner on 2nd pairing. Have Dermott and Polak or Carrick on the 3rd pairing until Zaitsev is back.


1.) 21 Jan 2018 00:37:18
No from Winnipeg.

2.) 21 Jan 2018 01:18:38
No chance the Jets give up Myers for a rental that would play on the 3rd or 4th line.

3.) 21 Jan 2018 02:41:26
Winnipeg won't be giving up Myers for a rental.

4.) 21 Jan 2018 16:31:25
Jets wouldn’t do it but JVR would not be a 3rd or 4th liner lol.

5.) 21 Jan 2018 17:14:06
Thats funny because 2 months ago people were wanting Myers traded for a bag of pucks. And JVR would be playing 2nd line.

6.) 21 Jan 2018 18:29:36
JVR has been playing 3rd line a lot this year tho. Third line now is JVR-Bozak-Brown.
With Schiffle out and wheeler over to center jvr would be in the top six in Winnipeg, yes.
Tough decision when Schiffle comes back as their top six has been just fine. Wheeler Schiffle Conner liane little Ehlers. They all have great chemistry I'm not sure I would bump any of them for jvr.



17 Nov 2017 11:06:28
To Toronto OEL and Strome

To Arizona Marner, Dermott, Kapanen/Leivo and a 1st in 2018


1.) 17 Nov 2017 11:38:05
Arizona laughs.

2.) 17 Nov 2017 11:54:39
arizona laughs? toronto laughs that's almost 4 first rounders maybe that's why your last.

3.) 17 Nov 2017 12:19:17
"Almost" 4 first rounders lol. good one john.

4.) 17 Nov 2017 15:38:02
First rounders are first round picks before the pick is made, and maybe if it’s a guy that was taken in the first round in either of the last 2 drafts. I’ll give you marner and the first as “first rounders” I don’t consider a guy taken wth a late first 4 drafts ago, a guy taken 2nd round 3 drafts ago, or a guy taken 3rd round 6 drafts ago 1st rounders haha.

5.) 17 Nov 2017 21:56:45
you so called hockey people get your facts straight marner 1st round kapenen 1st round 2018 1st round dermontt 31 st pick one shy of a 1st round.

6.) 18 Nov 2017 00:18:15
Kapanen at pick 22 is "almost" a second rounder then by that theory.

7.) 18 Nov 2017 00:21:35
And dermott was actually pick #34.

8.) 18 Nov 2017 03:16:14
what are you sens fans it's the same.



25 Oct 2017 16:31:34
To Toronto - Doughty

To LA - Marner, Dermott, Bracco and a 1st rounder


1.) 25 Oct 2017 17:19:41
WAY too much from toronto, take out marner and maybe.

2.) 25 Oct 2017 17:58:09
Take out Marner and LAK laughs at you. That's the main piece to actually interact them. Lol.

3.) 25 Oct 2017 19:10:45
Doughty is sweet don’t think LA trades doughty but I’m not sure if anyone else would trade a piece like Marner.

4.) 25 Oct 2017 22:05:47
It's a lot to give up from leafs, but kings don't even take that call if marner is taken out. Unless it's February 2019 and they know he isn't come, and they're out of the playoffs. That should be the only time kings would trade doughty for a package like that. But wth 2 years left at 7mill, he's untouchable without a young star going back.

5.) 26 Oct 2017 00:01:20
MArner obvs has to stay in the deal Pkane.

Maybe take out bracco. But maybe that's bias.

Its not too bad, but i just couldn't see it happening.

6.) 26 Oct 2017 10:52:20
I don't the kings do this trade either as they seem to be competing again. Just what i would like to see. I have no problem giving that up for him. And Kapanen could be called up to replace Marner. It is a downgrade but offense is one thing the leafs could afford.



19 Jun 2017 13:30:39
Leafs get Vegas to select Dumba and Manson. They then trade JVR, Carrick, 2017 and 2018 1st to Vegas for them.

Gives Vegas 2 more 1sts and they could also trade JVR for futures come deadline.

For leaf fans who don't want to give picks, you are getting 2 nhl top 4-6 right hand shots who are both very young.


1.) 19 Jun 2017 13:55:46
Could be argued 2 top 2-6 dmen.

2.) 19 Jun 2017 15:00:45
Don't know how's vegas is going to draft 2 d-men from Anaheim but ok.

3.) 19 Jun 2017 15:22:39
Dumba plays in Minnesota KingsLover, I guess it's try 50% of the kings fan base didn't know about hockey until 2012!

4.) 19 Jun 2017 15:43:21
Can I get some reasons why it's being voted no? If Toronto is giving too much than maybe a 2018 2nd instead of the 1st.

5.) 19 Jun 2017 16:21:40
I wouldn't give Jvr and 2 first for Manson and Dumba. Vegas would have take bad contracts off our hands to get those 3.

6.) 19 Jun 2017 20:25:09
Ok. then a 1st this year, 2nd next year jvr and Carrick. Remember Minny and the the ducks will field impressive offers to get vegas not to pick them. I would love a d unit consisting of
Reilly, Manson
Gardiner, Zaitsev
Dermott/ Rosen, Dumba.

7.) 19 Jun 2017 21:00:49
Why wouldn't you give JVR and a couple 1st for 2 good young dman.
IMO JVR was invisible in the playoffs.

8.) 20 Jun 2017 01:05:41
I'd do it from the leafs perspective. I'd obviously like to pay less, but you got to pay to get young good D. But it's 17th overall this year and you hope a later one next year. I don't think leafs need to push JVR out, but at the same time he's the logical forward to go. One year left at 4.25 is appealing to other teams and he's going to ask for a 6-7 year deal at more than 6mill which makes no sense for the leafs to do with the crop of forwards needing raises in the next 2 years. Carrick has a chance of being a decent nhler but he will be burried if you trade for two better RHd, so send him to give him a chance somewhere else.

9.) 21 Jun 2017 02:08:39
Toronto adds.



15 May 2017 14:40:56
Toronto gets Tanev

Canucks get 1st round pick 2017, Carrick and Bracco

Toronto gets Manson and Bieksa

Ducks get JVR.

D lines could be

Rielly and Manson
Gardiner and Tanev
Bieksa and Zaitsev.


1.) 15 May 2017 15:16:29
Why Bieska? But I do Manson. Big and plays physical.

2.) 15 May 2017 15:23:05
Ducks would need to dump salary. But in all honesty i don't mind Bieksa with 1 year left at 4 million. I think that makes for a good defendive group.

3.) 15 May 2017 15:54:03
I see all these trades involving Bieksa and I can't see them working out. If the Ducks convince him to waive his no-movement clause for the expansion draft, he will probably ask for assurances that if Vegas does not take him (which they wont) that he won't be traded. Why else would he waive? He has one year left to win a cup. Also the way Toronto treated some of its veterans last year, Bieksa knows he will be sent to the AHL, so he won't waive his NMC to go to the Leafs.

I would absolutely love to see Manson on the Leafs though. Much rather him than Tanev. Definitely pushing for the Leafs to trade JVR for a package involving Manson.

4.) 15 May 2017 17:08:51
DL7. I've been saying exactly what you said for all these Bieksa to Toronto traded now for a few weeks. I agree with you completely.

5.) 15 May 2017 18:16:32
Bieksa is absolutely different than Greening and Laich who i assume are who you are referring to. Bieksa is still a viable NHLer where as the other 2 arent. I am sure for him to waive his no trade clause he would be receiving assurance from a prospective new team that he would not be sent down to the minors. Anaheim will almost certainly be getting out of Bieksas contract as they need to keep lindholm, fowler and vatanen.

6.) 15 May 2017 18:19:14
And why wouldn't Vegas take Bieksa. A 4 million cap hit for 1 season for a team that has to meet a salary floor. The onlyvway they wouldn't take him is if Anaheim has something better to offer like Silferberg who i think they would absolutely want to keep.

7.) 15 May 2017 18:44:48
i liked what i saw from carrick, i'd keep him in toronto.

8.) 15 May 2017 18:54:07
Canucks take that and run.




Itookdonscherry's talk posts with other poster's replies to Itookdonscherry's talk posts


07 Sep 2017 12:20:23
Galchenyuk, Pacioretty and Juulson to NYI for Tavares and Lee.


1.) 09 Sep 2017 14:05:13
if i'm montreal i don't give that up unless he signs an extention south of 10m. and i don't see tavares signing for less than toews and kane.



07 Jul 2017 14:55:01
Interested to know what kind of rhd the leafs could get with a package of JVR, Kapanen/Bracco/Leivo and the 2018 1st rounder. What opinions are out there?


1.) 07 Jul 2017 15:56:56
I don't think u can lump Leivo in w Bracco and Kappanen. Their values are higher than his.

2.) 07 Jul 2017 16:51:31
None that are top 2 very few that are young top4. Probably a 30 + top 4 maybee.

3.) 07 Jul 2017 17:21:50
I think leivo will be better then both of them scene him play a lot in years past reminds me of a mark stone underrated type of player.

4.) 08 Jul 2017 01:32:28
Burns or Hedman of course Maybe take the pick out and could get Doughty.

5.) 08 Jul 2017 15:23:56
Would prefer to trade Brown over Kappy.

6.) 08 Jul 2017 15:24:01
JVR, Connor Brown, Travis Dermotte and 2018 1st for Trouba.

JVR+ for Honka and Lethonen

Connor Brown and 2018 protected 1st for Tanev

2nd Rd and Lievo for Mike Green.

7.) 08 Jul 2017 19:24:42
Why get Burns or Hedman when you can get Adam Larsson?

8.) 08 Jul 2017 19:27:47
Why get Doughty when you could get Adam Larsson though?

9.) 09 Jul 2017 01:01:54
Brown is already better then kappy. Kappy won't be that good nhl yes but not a sure top 6.

10.) 12 Jul 2017 23:54:12
You can't get Adam Larsson tho. Nice try.



26 Apr 2017 18:17:47
Saying it again as I think it's the best option for the leafs.....

JVR and Carrick for Manson and Bieksa plus pick improvement going the leafs way. Ducks get to keep Vatanen, Fowler and Lindholm while Toronto has a top 6 defense of

Reilly Manson
Gardiner Zaitsev
Dermott/Hunwick/Polak Bieksa

Makes leafs tougher on the back end and gives the ducks a top 6 forward they can protect.


1.) 26 Apr 2017 19:51:31
I think if you can convince a team to take Bieksa, Anahiem would have to sweeten the pot a little more, as your doing them a HUGE favor. Not really sure what though.

2.) 26 Apr 2017 21:34:21
I think you're right. Without trading any big assets this would be the way to go for both teams.

3.) 26 Apr 2017 22:34:52
Doesn't Bieksa have a NMC where he would have some control where he wants to go?
I think At this point in his career he would say no to a trade to the Leafs to be honest.
And Leafs could just sign a FA D man for their third pairing or give the ice time to a younger guy.

4.) 26 Apr 2017 23:29:30
Ya, he does have a NMC, so he would have to waive that. He may for Toronto Yup. its becoming more attractive to play there. But who knows.
I also agree, they could just go oit and sign a UFA.

5.) 27 Apr 2017 01:19:41
So Toronto protects Reilly, Manson, Gardiner and Bieksa. Who do they leave unprotected?



26 Feb 2017 15:57:29
As a leaf fan I wouldn't mind seeing Nash and Klein traded to Toronto. It's about a 10.5 mil cap hit with both contracts expiring after next year. Could you imagine Nash on Matthews left wing? The Rangers could use the cap space and I would imagine be very happy getting the cap space. With this, maybe the leafs could pick up some young assets such as picks or prospects. Would also open the leafs up to trading polar and or hunwick for more picks. What offers could you see having these players traded?


1.) 26 Feb 2017 16:44:52
well to be taking on all that cap leafs better be receiving some other pieces. I don't think Lou is nice enough to anybody favours.

2.) 26 Feb 2017 17:00:18
Maybe in the offseason.




Itookdonscherry's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

22 Feb 2018 13:02:42
It was also stated that ottawa would be best served trading Karlsson without the addition of a cap dump would make for the best return. Also i cannot see Point added. Tampa has cup aspirations and aren't likely to be sdding one of there top 5 point forwards. I can see Sergachev, Howden, Foote orcthat Libor Hajek guy and a 1st for Karlsson.




Click To View This Thread

21 Feb 2018 13:29:32
I think it would have to be lindholm Faulk and a pick for Draisatl.




Click To View This Thread

18 Feb 2018 19:03:57
No thanks from T.O.




Click To View This Thread

14 Feb 2018 23:08:03
Not likely Colt. and its not even close.




Click To View This Thread

14 Feb 2018 23:06:33
Nice reach Colt. Add Tarasenko for that. Sounds silly doesn't it?





Itookdonscherry has no Talk Replies