NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

Unbiased Jim's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Unbiased Jim's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Unbiased Jim's Posts

 

 

To Unbiased Jim's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Unbiased Jim's last 5 talk posts

 

To Unbiased Jim's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Unbiased Jim's last 5 talk replies

 

Unbiased Jim's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Unbiased Jim's rumours posts

 

27 Jul 2017 19:00:44
I know 3-team trades don't happen often but I thought I'd give it a try.

Leafs trade- Bozak, leivo, 1st (lottery protected) and 3rd
Oilers trade- RNH
Devils trade- Severson

Leafs get severson
Oilers get Bozak,
Devils get RNH, Leivo, 3rd

Leafs get a prime age RHD

Oilers get Bozak to replace RNH. He makes 4.2 instead of rnh's 6 mill and his contract expires the day mcdavids deal kicks in. They can try to resign him to a deal that works for both, They can allow him to walk after a playoff run or trade him for assets at the deadline. Also get the first.

Devils get a good centreman that can play anywhere in your top 9. Can play in all situations and with skilled players. They also get josh leivo who has shown flashes of being an nhl caliber sniper with very limited opportunity. And a 3rd round pick

Biggest problem I see is Devils depth on D doesn't really allow them to trade one for a C.

Unbiased Jim

1.) 27 Jul 2017 19:55:29
So Tor traded a first and it magically disappeared?


2.) 27 Jul 2017 20:45:26
Sorry. Oilers got the first. It says it in the explaination. Forgot it on the breakdown.


3.) 27 Jul 2017 20:53:59
How is that worth it for the leafs

Also i think the 1st was supposed to go to the oilers lol.


4.) 27 Jul 2017 21:08:43
If they just trade RNH for Bozak oh my gaawd.


5.) 27 Jul 2017 22:27:26
Lol. No.


6.) 28 Jul 2017 00:53:47
It's Bozak and a first.


7.) 28 Jul 2017 02:50:19
Devs lose big time. Their forwards are set, they need defemss now. Severson is their only saving grace.


8.) 28 Jul 2017 20:07:35
Oilers and Devils are trading good quality but leafs are just trading quantity. Typical lol.


9.) 28 Jul 2017 20:13:14
Good reasoning for your trades. Toronto seems to come out on the short end but is it for some salary relief?


10.) 29 Jul 2017 17:17:18
Hotguybabes. Leafs are getting one good, not great, defenseman and trading a good, not great, NHL centerman, a kid with upside, 1st round pick and a 3rd round pick. You make it sound like I have them getting doughty for 5 Marlies that will never play in the NHL.


11.) 01 Aug 2017 13:17:09
No way T. O does this
IF Bozak asks for a raise it will still be less than RNH contract.
He is the Leafs best faceoff man and gets more points than RNH
RNH is overpaid and overrated and not worth Leivo and a 1st.


 

 

29 Jun 2017 19:02:10
Just an option for short term for the leafs going forward. Tyler Bozak is good in his role, but reality is that after this contract he's going to be moving on or taking a pay cut, don't see that happening.

Pitts - Bozak (1 year@ 4.2mill)

Tor - G- Tristan Jarry and 2018 3rd round pick.

Leafs sign joe Thornton 2 years @ 6-6.5 per

Bozak has shown he can play with skilled players (kessel obviously) . With Bonino being a free agent and probably wanting multi year deal, this allows pens not have to commit long term to bonino and allows flexibility on the cap beyond this season. Also Jarry at 21 is obviously stuck behind Murray long term and they drafted filip gustavsson last season as a good goalie prospect. Losing bonino and fleury gives them more than enough cap space

For the leafs it gives them a good goalie prospect which they aren't very deep at. Bibeau and sparks are long shots, kaskisuo looks decent. It would also give hunter another draft pick to work with. If the leafs could then sign joe Thornton it would be a huge boost for the team but especially Matthews. As good of a player, leader and pro Bozak is, Thornton understands and can help Matthews body type, skill set and leadership needs so much more. Cap implications mean nothing to the leafs for those 2 years.

Unbiased Jim

1.) 29 Jun 2017 20:18:04
2018 1st and 3rd for Bozak.


2.) 29 Jun 2017 20:25:50
Not even close for bozak.


3.) 30 Jun 2017 14:18:30
I would agree Bozak is worth more but with a year left and probably not coming back it's a tough one. Also he might be worth More to another team but Penguins came to mind as a good fit. Pens prospect list outside the guys that finished to year with the team (guentzel, Wilson etc) is pretty weak and after trading their first this year for reaves, don't know if they would trade the 2018 too.


4.) 30 Jun 2017 15:36:43
🙈🙈🙈💩. Yikes.


 

 

20 Jun 2017 19:32:55
I know offer sheets don't happen often in today's NHL, but leafs are looking for a top 4 RHD. Apparently rumours are suggesting to find one on the trade market (vatanen, dumba, trouba) would take a first and a good prospect.

Colton parayko is a big guy, can play in all situations, can skate very well for his size and is an RFA. He also was Morgan Reilly's partner in the World Cup on the top pair after ekblad was hurt.

Compensation for a contract with an AAV between 5.88 and 7.85 mill is 2018 1st, 2nd and 3rd pick. As a leafs fan I would be far happier to see them part with those 3 picks for parayko than 2017 17th overall and Connor brown for one of those others.

Thinking like a 6 years x 6.75 mill.

Rielly Parayko
Gardiner Zaitsev
Top 4 for just under 20 mill all locked up Between 22 and 26 years old.

Unbiased Jim

1.) 20 Jun 2017 19:53:16
The problem with offer sheets is that no one really wants to overpay a player especially Maple leafs with huge contracts coming up and if u give a fair offer the respective team will match it most likely.


2.) 20 Jun 2017 20:09:30
Paryanko is on a different level then those 3. IMO Paryanko is the best U25 dman in the NHL.


3.) 20 Jun 2017 20:27:02
Ristolainen is better than parayko. But that's also your opinion not mine.


4.) 20 Jun 2017 20:32:35
Leafs don't have Their 2nd rnd pick or their third rnd pick in 2017 nor do they have a their 3rd rnd pick in 2018. So they will not be able to offer that amount of money. I would think the STL would match that any way. The only offer sheet toronto can offer is 4 first round picks. They require a third rnd pick in every situation above 4 mil a year.


5.) 20 Jun 2017 20:49:07
With that contract he isn't in your mentioned aav range. If you make an offer sheet the highest divisor for the aav is 5 (years) . So if you offer sheet 7x7 means that's an aav of 9.8 mil (49:5)


6.) 20 Jun 2017 23:47:11
Yah RIsto is not bad at all Same with Eklblad-Injurys. I'd say RIsto=Paryanko just a personal preference. I see Paryanko as a future shea Weber with speed.


7.) 20 Jun 2017 23:58:41
I like Parayko, however as an under 25 guy, ill take Ekblad and as McJesus says Risto. but it is close IMO between Risto and Parayko.


8.) 21 Jun 2017 02:11:11
Yeah just giving an example of something I think better. There's a lot of good dman under age 25 but parayko is defs up there.


9.) 21 Jun 2017 02:17:25
Yeah. Ekblad is the best one but he's obviously unattainable. The AAV I have him in would actually cost 2 1st rounders, a second and a third. 6x6.5 instead of 6.75 would keep it in the lower threshold meaning only 1 1st rounder. Again, doubt it would ever happen. Just an interesting thing to fill a RHD spot that most people are assuming will come via trade.


10.) 21 Jun 2017 03:29:01
parayko is sheltered behind peitrangelo on a very good defensive team. risto rielly and ekblad are all the top guys of their respective defensive units.


11.) 21 Jun 2017 04:40:50
What about patayko playing for team Canada and for team north America on top line was that sheltered too.


 

 

14 Mar 2017 23:29:59
Anaheim: Josh Manson, Jacob Larsson, 1st round pick.

Colorado: Gabriel Landeskog

This would be off season now obviously. It wouldn't happen unless ducks convinced bieksa to waive to be traded or waive to be exposed. Because if they still have to protect him, they will lose fowler, vatanen or lindholm and then would have to have these guys still available.

It gives ducks another gritty winger that can score and play an Anaheim style. Also gets him there without losing one of the big 3 D or montour/ Theodore which seems to be what guys are asking for when JVR/ Landy trades are offered.

Gives the avs 2 young D. One with a bit of experience and a mean streak and one with a good amount of upside along with a pick that should be later in the first round that they can draft a power winger to help losing landeskog or another D to help the depth there.

Also it MIGHT mean they can relax and wait on moving duchene for now if they potentially get 3 young D in this deal.

Unbiased Jim

1.) 15 Mar 2017 04:27:59
They would have to expose Rakell then.


2.) 15 Mar 2017 12:09:21
massive over payement by anaheim.


3.) 15 Mar 2017 15:26:33
To much for Landeskog. and if that's the case, as Stamkos16 said, Rackel is better than Landeskog.
Maybe Landeskog and a 2nd for Fowler. Then that might change the way Anaheim protects its roster? .
If I was Bieksa. i'd feel a little embarrassed. Lol. he's a washed up player that is putting his team in a bad situation.


4.) 16 Mar 2017 05:16:59
Why would they have to expose rackell? They can protect 7 F. Obviously getzlaf, Perry, kesler, landeskog would be. Who else would they protect over rackell? I said if bieksa waived meaning they could keep vatanen, lindholm and fowler and not have to do 8 skaters, but 7F, 3D and 1G.


5.) 16 Mar 2017 06:08:53
I'm confused why rackell would be exposed still. After the big 3F and landeskog, they could still protect rackell, cogliano and silferberg if they wanted.


6.) 16 Mar 2017 13:05:23
Because if they can't get Bieksa to waive then they are screwed.


7.) 16 Mar 2017 16:04:38
Well that's why I said this trade doesn't happen until he waives either to be traded to a team or to be exposed. But obviously rackell at his age and on a new contract on a 30+ goal pace is a priority to protect.


8.) 16 Mar 2017 16:19:14
And for the ones saying it's an overpayment, that's possible, I respect the opinion. How I was looking at it like this: the biggest piece ducks have been looking for over the last year+ is a power winger. If they could do that by trading 2 players and a late first in a weak draft and keep fowler, lindholm, vatanen, montour and Theodore, I think it's pretty good. To fill a void in your team while dealing from a position of strength and still hang on to the best 5 at that position, I'd call a success.


9.) 17 Mar 2017 21:04:06
I misread it Jim. my bad.
Like you said. all depends on Bieksa.
I personally think that Avalanche are going to want an eatablished yong dman for Landeskog. however, your proposal seems fair.


 

 

01 Mar 2017 14:07:54
Report says Val filpulla rejected trade to Toronto last week. Was supposed to go with Boyle and another asset for leafs taking his salary.

Ben Bishop most likely wouldn't have been traded if he had accepted. The high cost of giving no trade clauses!

Unbiased Jim

1.) 01 Mar 2017 16:26:10
Bishop would have been traded no matter what. Also, the Bishop trade was a day or two before the Boyle trade.


2.) 01 Mar 2017 23:51:40
so what hansen rejected a trade to montreal what is your point.


 

 

 

Unbiased Jim's talk posts with other poster's replies to Unbiased Jim's talk posts

 

01 Mar 2017 01:37:42
Oilers trade Davidson to Habs for Desharnais.

Unbiased Jim

 

 

25 Feb 2017 00:48:17
Leafs : shattenkirk

Blues Kapanen/ Leipsic/ Rychel and conditional 2nd (becomes a first of he signs an extension)

Cue the gasp from colt.

With shattenkirk now being reported to have stopped 3 trades (oilers, coyotes, lightning) that Armstrong has accepted because he wouldn't commit his next 7 years to those teams, the asking price is sure to come down or blues risk this deadline passing and having another player walk for nothing. At the end of the day, no movement clause or not, shatty has more power than most rentals.

Blues have made him the odd man out and he owes them nothing in the way of signing an extension where they want him to just to maximize the teams return. The offer might seem low but anyone criticizing it can check back in a week and revisit with what They really got. I'd be shocked if it's much more than a decent prospect and a conditional first.

Unbiased Jim

1.) 25 Feb 2017 18:30:05
Jim just as a rental any trade will start with a 1st rnd pick top prospect

That's going to be
1st 2017 no conditions
Kapanen
Plus a maybe Nikita Korostelev, as a small add.

Signed extension. Much more Tampa low balled him at 6mil I bet he would have taken 6.5 to 7 he'll yandle got 6.3 and he is older and not as good as shatty that's the market.


 

 

01 Dec 2016 22:28:32
The leafs clearly need to upgrade their D. But most of the people on here are going to the big name offensive guys (Hamilton, shattenkirk, Barrie etc)

They need a real solid top four dman, and offensive numbers shouldn't matter in this one.

After reading an article about the capitals afraid of not being able to afford to keep Alzner when he gets a much deserved raise from his 2.8 million, it got me thinking.

6'2 220 pound guy who can skate and move a puck but always takes care of his own zone first. 27 years old and leafs could afford to extend him for 5 years at 4.75-5.25

Wash- D Karl Alzner

Tor- D Andrew Nielson or Travis Dermott
F Brandon Leipsic (AHL scoring leader)
2nd round pick

Interested to hear what people think in terms of value and fit.

Unbiased Jim

1.) 01 Dec 2016 23:32:07
Leafs would take that lol


2.) 01 Dec 2016 23:32:38
Not bad good post


3.) 01 Dec 2016 23:37:26
Would be a good fit if he was a RHD but unfortunately he isnt.


4.) 01 Dec 2016 23:44:54
Tbh, I think your ripping off Wash. don't get me wrong I think Alzner could be a great fit for Tor. But their going to have to pay the price.

Tor:1rd pick 2017,3rd pick 2017

Was:Alzner

I was thinking JVR but caps would loose him in the extension draft.


5.) 02 Dec 2016 01:37:36
As much as it may be a really good deal, i just don't see a point for toronto. This is basically a rental deal, I doubt Alzner wants to waste his prime years on a team that, at max, will make the second round of the playoffs in the next 2-3 years. If he moved to a cup contender right now, he could easily have a couple of cups in the next few years? Although the trade makes sense, i just don't see a point for either side;

Washington wants to win NOW.
Toronto isn't going to win now and Alzner won't stay with the team.


6.) 02 Dec 2016 03:24:38
Washington are contenders though. Maybe add Polak as a somewhat replacement?


7.) 02 Dec 2016 03:38:25
absolutely ridiculous.

WSH isn't going to trade him for prospects. They want ot win; this doesn't help that.

You're kidding yourself if you think you're getting alzner for 5X5.

You're also kidding yourself if you think that package of bitches is going to get Alzner.


8.) 02 Dec 2016 05:33:14
ALSO he is a FA this year, and pretty sure he will hit it too, he is going to get 6x6 if not more, and yeah leafs need a rhd, alzner is great and all but he isn't the dman the leafs need. we need a young guy that can grow with the team.


9.) 02 Dec 2016 19:04:10
Being a caps fan, I would absolutely LOVE this trade to happen. However, being a caps fan, I know how much Alzner means to the team right now so Caps say no.


10.) 03 Dec 2016 00:39:04
You know how much Alzner means, yet you'd love to trade him for scrap pieces? That surprises me, even coming from you.


 

 

 

Unbiased Jim's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

22 Sep 2017 23:01:18
It's a hell no from the ducks, but Ritchie is not marner lol I'm a leaf fan, but I don't think you have to be a leaf fan to value marner higher. Ritchie is the type of prospect leafs fans got excited about 3-4 years ago. Freddy Gauthier, Tyler Biggs etc. Ritchie should be better than those guys for sure but he wouldn't be top 5 or 6 prospects on the leafs. Marner would be top or second on just about every team in the league.

Unbiased Jim

 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 Sep 2017 22:21:37
He may have screwed the leafs and himself by being a thin skinned whiner. Any person, especially a celebrity is going to get negative comments when they put themselves out there on social media. Now by responding leafs could face penalties and if he's deemed healthy to play, his free rose of golfing and fishing in Cali for 5.25 mill is going to be 20 hour bus trips to Texas and Iowa with the marlies for the same wage.

Unbiased Jim

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Sep 2017 15:40:19
I think sens have the pieces but seem pretty reluctant to part with them. I feel like canes would be a good fit because avs want young D, canes have the most young skilled D in the league and need a center. Seems like a fit.

Unbiased Jim

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Sep 2017 15:16:36
@mclarty. I agree huberdeau is better but you do realize he's a winger right? Barkov is their top centre. Barkov, bjugstad, trochek, Mckenzie.

@hothabs. Hubby's best season was not 50 pats at 25. He's only 24 lol he had 26 in 31 games as a 24 year old and 54 and 59 pts as a 22 and 23 year old. Also had 31 pts in the shortened 48 game season as a 20 year old. Track record speaks for itself.

Unbiased Jim

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 Sep 2017 14:35:42
If Tavares leaves, he's their only hope at a top line guy right now.

Unbiased Jim

 

 

 

Unbiased Jim's talk replies