NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

Vertius's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Vertius's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Vertius's Posts

 

 

To Vertius's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Vertius's last 5 talk posts

 

To Vertius's last 5 rumour replies

 

Vertius's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Vertius's rumours posts

 

06 Jan 2018 00:14:48
Van - Hutton

Arz - Duclair

Who add's?

Vertius

1.) 06 Jan 2018 00:26:44
No one, I think that's a pretty fair trade as is.


2.) 06 Jan 2018 00:34:41
I think Vancouver shouldn’t do this they already don’t have a great d core don’t get rid of a younger player for another forward.


3.) 06 Jan 2018 01:33:24
Honestly I can say Hutton is nothing special and he’s more frustrating to watch than anything, especially at the offensive zone because he never shoots even tho he has a clear open lane.


4.) 06 Jan 2018 07:32:25
I thought earlier this season and maybe before they said no to Hutton in any Duchene or Barrie talks.


5.) 06 Jan 2018 14:32:44
Yup you’re probably right but that’s pretty irrelevant considering Duclair plays in Arizona not Colorado.


6.) 06 Jan 2018 16:19:42
Duclair has got to be the most irrelevant player in history to ask for a trade.


7.) 06 Jan 2018 17:24:42
Yeah. When a kid like drouin asks for a trade, the insane untapped potential there is going to draw interest and people will deal with the assumption he could be “difficult”. But when a guy like Duclair, who I don’t think has the potential to be anywhere close to a real star player does it, I wonder if people feel the assets it takes are worth him plus his attitude. When Tocchet comes out and says he doesn’t give an effort, and he won’t listen, and he wants to do things his own way rather than buy into a system it makes me think “this guy can’t do the basics to have success in a market where the expectations and media coverage are very low, what chance does he have anywhere else?! ”.


8.) 06 Jan 2018 19:29:49
🤔. Well I would consider Duchene and Barrie being more valuable than Duclair, Would you?

So if they wouldn't include Hutton in a deal for one of them two, Why would they for Duclair?
See how relevant that comparison is now? I didn't think it was that hard of a comparison to understand actually.


9.) 07 Jan 2018 06:55:27
I didn't mean to imply that I thought it was a logical trade for either team, I don't really think it benefits either to be honest, it was just something that came into my head as a hypothetical kind of thing when I heard Duclair wanted out of ARZ.


 

 

 

Vertius's talk posts with other poster's replies to Vertius's talk posts

 

25 Feb 2019 20:53:14
Petan to the Leafs for Par Lindholm. think Jets fans will finally admit how worthless he is now that he didn’t bring in Stone? Lol.

Vertius

1.) 27 Feb 2019 12:31:55
I actually never minded Petan as a 4th liner. I think leafs made a good move with that one.


 

 

 

Vertius's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

16 Apr 2019 23:55:43
Jeez, should I draw a picture for you all?

D1-D2 = Top 2 defenseman/ pairing 1
D3-D4 = Top 4 defenseman/ pairing 2
D5-D6 = Top 6 Defenseman/ pairing 3

I mean come on, this really isn’t that hard. Instead of talking about ‘how long you’ve been following hockey’ for Renidrag or ‘how good your English is’ Zamboni - which I hate to break it to you, isn’t good at all - you both should try actually listening to some games cause clearly you don’t know as much as you think you do if you don’t even know basic terms like that.

Vertius

 

 

Click To View This Thread

15 Apr 2019 20:19:24
Jeez, where does this reductions value for Kadri come from? He wouldn’t get you Barrie straight up let alone a first AND Colorado taking on Zaitsev.

Vertius

 

 

Click To View This Thread

15 Apr 2019 20:18:11
Heeeeeeell no from Philly. Gost is way younger and has the potential to return to his dominating offensive form.

Vertius

 

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Apr 2019 23:20:18
Top six as in the 3rd pairing, just as top four means the second pairing and top 2 refers to the first pairing. I don’t know why you’re on a hockey site if you don’t even understand basic terminology like that.

Vertius

 

 

Click To View This Thread

13 Apr 2019 20:37:36
Biased? No. I just know a bad deal when I see it, Armia is a 3rd liner at best which is what Leivo already is, and Brook is a top6 defenseman at best, exactly what Hutton already is. No thanks.

Vertius

 

 

 

Vertius has no Talk Replies