NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts

 

sosahabs24's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




sosahabs24's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To sosahabs24's Posts

 

 

To sosahabs24's last 5 rumours posts

 

To sosahabs24's last 5 talk posts

 

To sosahabs24's last 5 rumour replies

 

To sosahabs24's last 5 talk replies

 

sosahabs24's rumours posts with other poster's replies to sosahabs24's rumours posts

 

21 May 2018 22:18:57
Probably way off.. and of course I want to see him on my Habs.. but what about a Buffalo and NYI blockbuster...
Tavares on a sign and trade plus a small add due to age difference.
For Jack Eichel.
.

I'm not a huge Eichel fan due to his personality..I think his ego may be to much to have someone who is coming in the league with even more hype than he did.. Dahlin..
Buffalo gets a strong leader in Tavares..reunited with Okposo.. NYI still gets to have a Star center..

sosahabs24

1.) 22 May 2018 01:48:53
Islanders won’t be adding anything extra.


2.) 22 May 2018 03:08:38
No way buffalo touches this Eichel is 20 and is almost as good as Tavares. I’d trade Austin Mathews for Jack Eichel as a leafs fan. And I wouldn’t trade Mathews for Barzel and a player you could get for free in Free agency. In two seasons Eichel will out produce Tavares career highs I’m calling it right now. With that being said if I were buffalo I’d trade O’rielly and sign Tavares to be the 2 c.


3.) 23 May 2018 16:37:28
I wouldn’t trade Matthews for Eichel first off. Secondly, buffalos ownership has committed to Eichel with that massive contract and has apparently allowed him atleast some input on firing and hiring or coaches and gm lol they don’t do that and then trade him 10 months later.


 

 

17 Jan 2018 04:51:28
If I'm Garth Snow, does the emergence of Barzal change my way of thinking????
I have been obvious about my desire for the Habs to land Tavares.. ya it's still a crap shoot... however... if I am Snow.,, I build around Barzal.. I don't let Tavares get to July 1st, but trade him for top dollar.. yes !! I want my Habs to get him , however.,I have 2 trades.. who ya take.
Vancouver
Horvat
Joulevvi
1ST
FOR Tavares

Montreal
Galchenyuk
Lindgren
Juulsen
2nd 18,× 2(both)
1st 2019

These deals are both on the contingent that he signs 8x11 at 88 once he is traded.

sosahabs24

1.) 17 Jan 2018 06:08:49
I take Horvat, Joulevi, Van 2018 1st over
Galchenyuk, Lindgren, Juulsen, two 2018 2nds, 2019 1st.


2.) 17 Jan 2018 06:11:16
Horvat is the most proven of all this. I think Juolevi has more value than pretty well all the Montreal pieces. And that Van forst this year should be pretty good.

Make he Montreal 1st 2018 not 2019 and it changes it a bit. It still prefer Van package over Montreals.
Mainly becaUs Horvat is proven and the other two pieces are more potential than any of MTLs.


3.) 17 Jan 2018 07:29:26
Uhhhh no you definitely don’t build around barzal you keep Tavares who is a top 10 player in the world lol. I see your reasoning but no way, I really do think he will resign in New York and imo neither of these trades are enough to get him (im talking value wise not as he’s a UFA) .


4.) 17 Jan 2018 08:09:31
Good points both Edmonton Boyz.

McJesus. yes Tavares is top 10, however, resign him for 8 years, puts him at what? 35? Or Barzal, focus on him, Bellows. ext. In 8 years both are in middle of Prime. I get what your saying

Wouldn't surprise me however, at end if career. m Barzal, more points than John Tavares
I really like Tavares, however, I often wonder, is he a Superstar. or Really good player. there is a diffdefence.


5.) 17 Jan 2018 14:02:55
I think Mtl shouldn’t sign Tavares
We already have bad contracts

Not to mention that 80 million goalie.


6.) 17 Jan 2018 15:12:37
I would say having that 80 million dollar goalie is a good reason to get an 80 million dollar centreman to go with your 80million dollar defensman because they are so committed now, after those moves and trading sergachev, deciding to go another direction now will set any rebuild back many years before it even begins.


7.) 17 Jan 2018 16:19:33
Too much for a rental because Tavares would never re-sign in Van.

Montreal would be better off to just snag him at UFA time w/ o losing assets.


8.) 17 Jan 2018 17:54:40
I think one of the reasons Tavares might stay in NYI is the emergence of Barzel. Not saying it's the only reason, but it's one of many and it does help a little.


9.) 17 Jan 2018 18:20:36
Tavares is a superstar now, and you don’t trade those players. Barzal emerged as a very fun player to watch this year but tbh he had to play two extra years in junior! He wasn’t projected to be this good but unreal player for islanders now his skating is phenomenal but you still don’t trade Tavares. You keep him and you have him, Barzal, bellows, and all those other guys who will come up.


10.) 17 Jan 2018 22:49:03
I agree you try to keep Tavares if you can, and as much as he is saying the right things about wanting to stay, he isn’t holding any talks. As a management team you want to show patience with him and respect him by at the same time the deadline is coming and if he isn’t going to stay, you have to make a plan. You can’t have the best player your team has seen in decades walk for nothing.


 

 

30 Nov 2017 22:18:34
!Habs aquire Cracknell from NYR for Holland.

Huh?? Anyone else have any idea why this was made.. Bergevin must be bored?? Or is it jus so he can say he did something.?

sosahabs24

1.) 01 Dec 2017 03:44:24
I don't like this. Holland is a pretty good depth forward. Cracknell is not.


2.) 01 Dec 2017 04:58:29
A little of both? Trying to make it look like he's trying.


3.) 01 Dec 2017 06:11:42
I’m surprised Holland wasn’t on the starting roster. I thought he was pretty good in Toronto.


4.) 01 Dec 2017 13:52:37
Holland was signed for 2 years next year being a one way contract. i guess they couldn't see a situation where he would be making the starting lineup this year or next year so they traded him for a guy who brings about the same value to laval and is a ufa at years end that they don't even have to try and find a place for next season. Not hard to figure out guys.


5.) 01 Dec 2017 14:10:45
Apparently holland ask for a trade when he saw Daniel carr + byron Froese being call to play for the big team and not him.


 

 

19 Jun 2017 20:01:17
VAN
send Tanev and Virtanen
BUFFALO
send Kane and Beaulieu.

sosahabs24

1.) 19 Jun 2017 21:38:06
I think buffalo passes on this one. If virtanen was more ready I think it could work.


2.) 21 Jun 2017 01:54:46
No way from Van. I wouldn't trade Tanev for Kane and Virtanen for Beaulieu.


 

 

17 Jun 2017 19:03:04
Beaulieu to Sabres for a 3rd... hmm not sure how I feel bout that..
Must be something else in the works

sosahabs24

1.) 17 Jun 2017 19:06:30
Yeah he must have a trade for a dman coming back I'd assume.


2.) 17 Jun 2017 19:20:10
It's obviously the best deal the Habs could get for him.


3.) 17 Jun 2017 19:22:16
Great deal for the sabres.


4.) 17 Jun 2017 19:37:46
Definitely something in the works in order to help the loss in Defense.

As for this trade though, I see it as pretty reasonable. Beaulieu is good but often overrated in terms of value. So I think Montreal got the best they could for him because there are a lot of teams that have their own Beaulieu type that aren't worth what the Beaulieu asking price started as.

Either way, I hope Beaulieu turns it around for Buffalo and Montreal finds a way to make up for their loss in defensive depth.


5.) 17 Jun 2017 20:03:32
lol
robbed.


6.) 17 Jun 2017 21:44:47
Really think beaulieau will excel on the Sabres.


 

 

 

sosahabs24's talk posts with other poster's replies to sosahabs24's talk posts

 

01 May 2019 17:42:26
What do you guys think Karlsson will sigh for now?? Has being on a good team/ on same team as Burns overshadowed his value?? At one point he seemed like a top 5 player in league.. now,not sure he is even a top 5 Dman..

sosahabs24

1.) 01 May 2019 18:06:38
Honestly he was never a top5 dman.

By this i mean he should have been considered a forward. He got points and was a below to average defensive dman. He was also injury prone. His team never accomplished anything with him on it other than a few playoff births.


2.) 01 May 2019 19:30:22
Well Colt. he did win a couple Norris trophies as NHLs best Dman.
Regardless, he was/ is viewed as a top Dman in the game. I jus want to know what you all think he is worth now? I wouldn't pay him 10+, but some team will.
Personally, I'd say 8.5.


3.) 01 May 2019 19:36:46
agree with Redwing, he has also been playing a career with no real talent anywhere else on the ice but in goal. I truly believe the sens padded his stats and ice time regardless of how poor the defensive side of his game was, playing with other gifted players in San Jose he doesn't get to take 100% of the offensive chances like it did in ottawa. I believe agreeing to be traded without an extension was a huge mistake for him for July 1.


4.) 01 May 2019 20:50:48
Karlsson to NJ for 7 years at 80mil.


5.) 01 May 2019 21:00:23
Ya think he gets that much hey VB? Your probably right , I still prefer him at 8.5, which I know is light.
Why Jersey? Jus wondering why you think he goes there? Cause they have the Cap room?


6.) 01 May 2019 21:58:32
I've heard rumors that the Rangers are trying to get panarin, but if they miss out they're making a pitch to get karlsson but I still believe Tampa could be in the mix because of their tax rate combined with the new jerseys and new Yorks not wanting to give 11.5 for 7 years for a guy hitting the wrong side of 30.


7.) 02 May 2019 02:31:26
I think NJ because Ray Shero is a bold GM and with Taylor hall ( without Karlsson And Hughes ) they were a contender. NJ has the cap space and I believe with Karlsson, Hughes and a healthy Hall they are a contender. Tampa is going to have trouble signing Vais and Point let alone adding Karlsson.


8.) 02 May 2019 13:09:26
I don’t think 1 8th seed playoff appearance (and elimination in 5) makes them a contender when it’s sandwiched by 1st overall picks. They should be set up pretty good for the future but they aren’t a top 10 NHL team or anything m.


9.) 02 May 2019 21:24:52
like i stated in my post above. The norris isn't about defense any more its basically the rocket richard trophy for position dmen. Karlson is horrible as an actual defender.


10.) 03 May 2019 13:47:13
There has only been a couple times in history that the best defensive defenseman won the Norris so this isn't really anything new.


11.) 04 May 2019 18:47:51
Karlson is not horrible as an actual defender. he's decent be not solid. Deff not horrible tho.


12.) 08 May 2019 00:55:44
no no I Redwing is right, ever see when he's playing a 1 on 1 and he pivots the wrong way and the guy just breezes past him? like wtf? it's the nhl, shouldn't someone have corrected him back in atom or pee-wee?


 

 

27 Apr 2019 04:12:13
Lots of talk about how all of our Canadian teams did .. , so now with all that done,, what band wagon are you guys jumping on .. and why?? Or did some of ya say ,, screw it lol.

I guess I'll say SanJose,, be nice to see Thornton win..

sosahabs24

1.) 27 Apr 2019 06:59:53
Anyone but Boston I'm not worried yet cause I still don't think they have a prayer anyway.


2.) 27 Apr 2019 08:22:11
I’m with you Sosa. Being a leaf fan I’ve needed a team to cheer for in the playoffs team for years. I’ve always liked San Jose because they beat the wings. Joe Pavelski is still my favourite player because he’s a wing killer and big Joe needs a cup. I live in Windsor, being a border city Detroit fans were nasty. They’ve been quiet for a couple years but Yzerman might change that.


3.) 27 Apr 2019 21:00:48
I think I’ll hop on the Dallas bandwagon.


4.) 27 Apr 2019 22:25:34
I like the aves. not necessarily this year but man oh man, with the young d men they have coming and a top 5 pick this year they’re going to be a great team for years. They’re a goalie away from being a top contender.


 

 

18 Apr 2019 23:15:37
Been a few days now..thought someone else would maybe comment about it, no one did , so I will.... what does everyone think of Ovi beating up a kid?

I would like to see the return of the Goon.. I'm seeing way to many dirty hits, stick work, and then the Ovi smack down.. If I was Brindamour,I have someone take on Ovi right away , however, he is a big man, who can hold his own, but.. I'd make a statement,, that isn't tolerated.. I thought it was a disgrace.. beating up a kid

sosahabs24

1.) 19 Apr 2019 03:00:10
Really? Would’ve thought you would be on the other side of the argument. Lol
The kid started the fight did he not? Ovi did absolutely nothing wrong. It’s not the first time an 18 year old has fought, I don’t know why that’s the issue.
I feel like goons would pick there spot and going after a star player for accepting a fight wouldn’t be the right spot.


2.) 19 Apr 2019 03:15:51
But when the kid asks for it is it still a disgrace? I mean if this was Brady tkachuk would you feel different?


3.) 19 Apr 2019 03:44:46
In ovechkins defense, he isn’t typically fighting. I believe I read that he hadn’t fought in like 9 years or something. So clearly there was no malice in it because he obviously doesn’t need to fight to make a difference every night. Also from what I’ve read and watched, Svechnikov consented to the fight, ovechkin even said that svechnikov is the one that wanted to fight, which wouldn’t surprise me because ovechkin doesn’t have a history of fighting. I don’t believe that younger skilled players should be targeted just to make sure they can’t play, but I don’t see anything wrong with this particular instance.


4.) 19 Apr 2019 05:25:25
Lol wat? The kid started it. Should ovi just eat some punches because, reasons? That’s not how fights work.


5.) 19 Apr 2019 14:41:33
The kid may have chirped. But he is still a kid. Any of you guys in your 30s or 40s, ask yourself., would you knockout a kid. I know I wouldnt. Ovi coulda jus wrestled him to the ground. gave him a warning. I don't know, I have a problem with a 33 year old knocking out a barely 19 year old . bigger issue I have, no one did anything. why I'd like to see a Goon back in the game.
I think players would be a little more responsible with the stick work. the dirty hits, and situations like the Ovi fight, if they knew they would maybe have to answer to a John Scott, or a Colton Orr type.


6.) 19 Apr 2019 16:17:47
I wish there was 3 or 4 fights every game.


7.) 19 Apr 2019 17:30:41
Again, not how fights work. Any adult — young or old — can inflict a lot of damage with one well-placed punch (let alone a professional athlete who is in way better shape than your average male) . All it takes is one shot and it could have been Ovi unconscious on the ice. You can’t expect him to take that chance and try and “wrestle him to the ground”, especially in the heat of the moment.


8.) 19 Apr 2019 19:34:00
Well unfortunately, I have done a lot of fighting in my day. some sanctioned. others bar brawls. so I kinda know how it works lol.
However I just don't see what Superstar like Ovi needs to knock out a kid. I jus would like to see some teammates stick up for the kid. like they use to back in the day.


9.) 19 Apr 2019 20:43:47
Have you? because based on what you’ve been saying it sounds a lot like you’ve never been in so much as a dustup before.


10.) 19 Apr 2019 20:50:07
I can't help but feel if it was Crosby instead of ovechkin you would feel differently. I may be wrong I love fights in hockey I feel players should try and stick to there weight class but when someone is looking for a fight I couldn't care less if a 50 year old beats up an 18 year old. Now I wouldn't have agreed with this as much if Tom Wilson beat up svechnikov but if he went looking for it I still wouldn't give him a lot of pity.


11.) 19 Apr 2019 21:21:04
Lol. ya Unsportsmanlike. like I said, unfortunately I have been, was in MMA, then A collector In an organized crime outfit then in Federal Corrections for 5 years. so yes. I've been in a few. However, even in that. never beat up kids. Lol.


12.) 19 Apr 2019 21:22:43
My main thing. is why hasn't anyone done anything for the kid.?


13.) 19 Apr 2019 21:28:33
It’s the playoffs Svechnikov got exactly what he wanted. He’s also like 6.3 200+ pounds not your average 19 year old and even if he was 5.3 120 pounds he’s still in the NHL and he should be treated equal to everyone else.


14.) 19 Apr 2019 22:08:01
I would think the reason the canes haven't done anything is because if they did they would probably have to face Tom Wilson also they may be thinking it was a fair fight and svechnikov was looking for trouble.


 

 

11 Apr 2019 05:47:05
Other than the Sharks looking like they will hold on to beat Vegas, that was kind of a weird 1st night of playoffs..

sosahabs24

1.) 11 Apr 2019 17:49:42
the blues and jets series has been pretty much portrayed by the sports media as WPG will beat the blues hands down. They based this on the 3-1 series during the regular season. The 3 wins for WPG happened when blues were last in the division. The 1 win the blues had was when they turned it around and Winnington took over. The blues had the best nhl record in the second half of the season and wpg was trending in the other direction. The blues match up very well against WPG and have scoring from all 4 lines. You add that with our top line our top defense and Winnington the blues def have the advantage.

Blues are a dangerous team.


2.) 11 Apr 2019 23:43:19
Blues are a dangerous team and were probably the best team in the league since Christmas so it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they won this series. That being said imo there is not a more complete roster in the league then Winnipeg. They haven't really showed it lately and may not get it together in time but if they do they should be as dangerous as anyone.


3.) 12 Apr 2019 00:47:15
I’d disagree, I think there really close but the Jets have the better team in every position IMO. Goal is up for debate because who knows what Binnington is. In saying that I took the Blues in 7 🤷🏻‍♀️.


4.) 12 Apr 2019 11:16:36
I’ve read an article suggesting Winnipeg was having some trouble in the dressing room down the stretch. Obviously no idea if it’s valid or not but maybe there’s some dissention within the team.


 

 

10 Apr 2019 05:46:09
Jack Hughes will be first number one... who really shouldn't be in NHL after draft.. he's not ready... to small.. if a man hits him, the boy is going to be hurt. Imagine , him and a Weber, or a 42 year old muscle man Chara in the corner with him.. or an open ice hit.. boy will done.. plus.. . He won't have Canadian Toughness.. jus ne another Yankee puss. Lol😉

sosahabs24

1.) 10 Apr 2019 07:13:38
Eh man americans ain't no slump, you really shouldn't speak considering your team is golfing as we speak


2.) 10 Apr 2019 10:45:29
Was a joke to fire up some of the old school boys on here Moneyhands. go make a Dman comparison. see if it's any better than your forwards. eh.


3.) 10 Apr 2019 12:03:23
Yeah I hear what you are saying Sosa but the game has changed a lot. Without the clutching/ grabbing smaller guys are able to thrive, and while Hughes getting caught with his head down against a big boy would be lights out, almost all of the smaller players are well aware of it and keep their heads up and on a swivel. The little guys are also very elusive — there’s a ton of undersized players in the NHL already and you don’t see them getting lined up much at all.

Also I’d be careful about how much shade you throw at the Americans. The sport is growing in popularity in the U. S. and with the bigger population they are starting to produce a LOT of players including high end talent. I’m worried it could start to threaten Canada’s stranglehold on the game.


4.) 10 Apr 2019 15:23:54
They are like locusts Unsportsmanlike . lol., they are everywhere lol ya, they are starting to close the gap between the 2 Nations. personally think Canada has to change the way they so some things at development level.


5.) 10 Apr 2019 17:45:47
Kakko will be picked first hughes second.


6.) 11 Apr 2019 00:03:42
I can't see Devils not taking Hughes. With him and Heischer, probably will be a decent 1 2 center punch for years to come. also, with Hall contract up, as much as I think Hughes is a bit small atm. he will be able to get Hall the puck. make it more attractive for him to want to stay.
I think Kakko very well may be the better player in the long run however.
The Rangers have a pretty easy choice this draft.


7.) 13 Apr 2019 01:38:48
Yeah I don't think he is going #1 kakko should.


 

 

 

sosahabs24's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

23 May 2019 01:32:09
Would you have traded that pick a couple years ago, knowing it was Laine or Matthews for say. I dunno who's comparable . maybe Petro?
Maybe not a good comparison, however, NYR are not going to trade either Hughes or Kakko for Trouba.

sosahabs24

 

 

Click To View This Thread

22 May 2019 20:50:41
What? . Really? The 2nd overall for Trouba? I think that's way to much for Trouba.

sosahabs24

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 May 2019 15:28:22
I didn't realize he was already 25.wow time flies. I think Detroit is going to have to add then. Maybe a prospect or pick. as RNH is the better player.

sosahabs24

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 May 2019 07:05:18
Well, I dunno. could Edmonton maybe trade some of their promising young D. maybe Bear? Bring back some some help got now. but . then again, who really does Detroit have that would be affordable and and a good fit .
Yes. RNH has proven more., I think Mantha has 40 goal potential., deffinetley 30 to 35. this is an interesting deal. one is more proven. one has more potential and starting to be a good player.

sosahabs24

 

 

Click To View This Thread

21 May 2019 04:26:19
I jus read about this. hmm. could be good for Oliers. would like to see other pieces involved, maybe some d prospects from Edmonton and a more established Dman coming back.?

sosahabs24

 

 

 

sosahabs24's talk replies