NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


themostleaf33's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from: Toronto

Favourite player: Matts Sundin

Best team moment: 2016 clinch against Pittsburgh

Interests: Hockey

Timezone: (GMT -5:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada), Bogota, Lima

themostleaf33's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To themostleaf33's Posts



To themostleaf33's last 5 rumours posts


To themostleaf33's last 5 talk posts


To themostleaf33's last 5 rumour replies


To themostleaf33's last 5 talk replies


themostleaf33's rumours posts with other poster's replies to themostleaf33's rumours posts


08 Nov 2018 21:20:57
So there are reports of Sprong (Pittsburgh) being on the trade block, and with Schultz out long term (and Jack Johnsson rubbishing the bed so far) the Pens could want to acquire a defenceman.

To Penguins:
To SJ:

1 for 1, a simple trade, obviously if this was more realistic "balance picks" would be involved.




20 Oct 2018 21:10:18
Deal now:
To Carolina:
Nylander, Durzi, Marincin, Neilson
To Leafs:
Pesce, Foegele, Zykov

In January (for cap space and for defence improvement)
2019 1st, Zaitsev, Leivo
To Leafs:
Pulock, possible pick/prospect depending on Pulock's play, Zaitsev's play, and Leivo's play up to that point

Deadline deal
To Columbus:
Gardiner (extension from Columbus required), condtional 2020 1st (becomes 2nd, 2021 3rd if Panarin doesn't re-sign), Brown, 2019 4th
To Leafs:
Panarin (he will be cheaper to get by this point)

*Ennis, Gauthier

Cmon how could you not love that team?
Scratched players all under $700 thousand

Solid 4th line and each player under 1mill

Third line of hard workers that can score and take on other teams top lines

And the other two are nothing special, just so we can throw a team together 😂

People seemed to like this on the leafs rumours site, so I wanted to branch out a bit and get more opinions


1.) 21 Oct 2018 01:40:08
I’d make all of those trades from a leafs POV.

2.) 21 Oct 2018 08:41:03
So if VB says he'd do all those trades from a Leafs POV, this prolly tells you all you need to know about whether those trades are fair.

3.) 21 Oct 2018 14:04:19
coming from the guy who thinks Stamkos>Mathews and Crosby—>Fantasy league.

4.) 21 Oct 2018 22:45:10
But Stamkos IS better than Mathews 🤔

Mathews: 69, 63 point seasons
Stamkos: 46, 95, 91, 97, 57, 40, 72, 64, 20, 86,
Mathews was injured 20 games season #2 and Stamkos was injured half or so of season #5, 6, 9.
Mathews 1 - 40 goal season
Stamkos 4 - 40+ goal season, 1 is 51 and 1 is 60.
Not sure how you argue those numbers.

5.) 22 Oct 2018 03:01:01
Ok but Matthews also missed about a quarter of the season last year, he would’ve hit 70 for sure and probably 75, maybe even 80.

6.) 22 Oct 2018 04:05:43
You can’t argue those numbers. Stamkos has been a stud for years and leaf fans can only hope Matthews has a career as good as Stamkos.

7.) 22 Oct 2018 09:38:06
"coming from the guy who thinks Stamkos>Mathews and Crosby—>Fantasy league. "
Well #1 I literally never said anything about that since that never was a topic and #2 as pointed out above by others, Stamkos has had an impressive career. This season so far, Matthews is the better player, no doubt.

8.) 22 Oct 2018 17:31:09
It’s funny how my posts are always used for arguing about stuff not related to it.



18 Oct 2018 16:12:25
This trade would never happen but you know I just feel like this today
To Leafs:
Bobrovsky, Panarin, Nutivaara
To Columbus:
Anderson, Gardiner, Nylander, 2020 2nd


1.) 18 Oct 2018 19:24:23
Never happen like you said. Bobrovsky apparently wants Price money. So taking that into consideration, I’m satisfied with Andersen at $5mill for 3 more years. 5 years control of Nylander for a year of Panarin isn’t worth it. And UFA Gardiner for a 20 year old good Dman makes no sense for CBJ. If they’re losing their star goalie and best forward, what is the point of adding Gardiner?

2.) 18 Oct 2018 19:47:29
Nylander is not close to panarin, maybe nylander will be 5 years from now but not close right now, panarin has earned 8+ a year, nylander hasnt.

3.) 18 Oct 2018 22:24:32
Read what he said Shoots, he said he prefers having Nylander under control for 5 more years than having Panarin for 1. And he is right.

4.) 19 Oct 2018 12:26:12
What he said is they're equal, nylander wants more money that isn't earned, panarin is proven he's earned a contract, nylander has a few years to earn. Much rather have panarin at 6 mil this year than 8 mil nylander. Panarin has much better stats playing with lesser players.

5.) 19 Oct 2018 12:40:01
If leafs can sign nylander at 6m-6.5 for 3-5 years, he's worth it, but at his contract demands, he ain't worth nothing. No team is paying a 60 point player 8 million a year long term.

6.) 19 Oct 2018 12:55:36
And not responding to Jim if that's what's you're talking about cherry, he always has good input, I get the control of the player but they are not equal, not close, not what I was talking about.

7.) 19 Oct 2018 17:39:25
My apologies Shoots, thought you were referring to the 1st response.

8.) 19 Oct 2018 19:47:12
Yeah, player for player I’m not debating Nylander equals panarin. Just that panarin will demand $8.5+ mill in July which he will be worth but we can’t afford and we would be competing with 30 teams to try to keep him. Nylander can demand $8.5mill all he wants, Dubas controls his future. So at the end of the day it’s trading off 5 years of a 60-70 pt guy for 1 year of a 75-80 pt guy, when scoring is the least of our worries.

9.) 20 Oct 2018 05:01:48
Totally agree jim.

10.) 20 Oct 2018 16:12:36
Ya but Nylamder could become a 80-100 point guy. Here's why, how many players have we seen getting 30-60 points season until the age of 23 and then after that getting 60+ points season? Barkov is an example. I think 60 is just the start for Nylander I don't know why people think he can't prosgress more then just a 70 point player. I've never been a fan of leafs but if mtl can get Nylander oh boy what a team. And why would he take less the 7 million? Because Pastnark took a discount 2 years ago so Nylander has to be lower then what Boston plays him? Lol.



10 Oct 2018 14:47:37
With Murray down, do you think Pittsburgh could think about aquiring Bobrovsky?
To Columbus:
Desmith, 2019 1st, Sprong, Maatta
To Pittsburgh:
Bobrovsky (1 year extension), Milano


1.) 10 Oct 2018 16:03:14
I think Columbus is going to ride Bobrovsky myself. A 2x Vezina winner in net to carry them deep into the playoffs. He’s still regarded my most to be the best goalie in the league. AS Columbus sees themselves as competitive, you can be sure they will keep him. As we saw last year, and virtually almost every year, a hot goalie can carry a team all the way. And who better to bet on than Bobrovsky?

2.) 10 Oct 2018 16:59:44
What's with the 1 year extension? You think bobrovsky or any other star player would sign a 1 year extension? I know I don't.

3.) 10 Oct 2018 19:08:03
Idk just to make it more fair I guess.



09 Oct 2018 14:25:33
Once Kase is back from his concussion:
To Anaheim:
Nylander, Brown, Zaitsev
To Leafs:
Manson, Kase

Nylander goes over to replace Perry long term, and Anaheim can either keep Perry on LTIR or deal him

Deadline deal:
To Columbus
Gardiner (extension), Marincin, Moore, 2019 2nd
To Leafs:
Savard, Milano

*Goat, Ennis

Posted this on the leafs rumours site but I wanted more opinions on it


1.) 09 Oct 2018 16:23:20
The Columbus deal would have to happen first so we have Savard to replace Zaitsev when we trade him. Otherwise we short ourselves at RHD again. Granted, Manson is better than Zaitsev. But we need someone to compliment him, not replace him.

The Anaheim deal looks pretty good. Not sure Anaheim will be wanting to move Kase though. They need all the forwards they can get.

The Columbus deal looks like it favours the Leafs. Let’s just say for arguments sake if, and it’s a big if, Gardiner = Savard, then I don’t feel the rest of what you are offering is equal to Milano. He said going to be a real stud. Marincin is garbage. Moore is half decent prospect, and the 2nd May never work out. For Milano you would have to be willing to give up a decent NHL player who can contribute immediately.

I like all the guys you suggested. Lineups look good. With a little tweaking, I think you have the right idea.

2.) 09 Oct 2018 17:06:02
Couldn’t we just do this until the Savard trade
Rielly/ Manson
Gardiner/ Hainsey
Dermott/ Ozhiganov
*Holl, Marincin
I mean Hainsey already has top 4 experience and he can cover for Gardiner’s mistakes so why not?

3.) 09 Oct 2018 17:11:15
Also, I know Anaheim won’t want to move Kase, which is why I send back Brown as well, so they are actually getting 2 forwards back for 1
Milano isn’t going to be that good, he is playing 4th line right now and is basically a replacement of Brown, if anything I would add Leivo because we already have Ennis.

4.) 09 Oct 2018 17:50:52
Pretty sure anahiem doesn't have the cap room to do this. Unless they plan to waive kesler and perry when they get back from injury. Then this deal turns into perry kesler manson kase for nylander brown and zaitsev which I don't think they even consider.

5.) 09 Oct 2018 18:47:31
That cancels out
The whole point of this deal for Anaheim is to have a long term replacement for Perry, his contract is more then Nylander’s will be so when Perry gets back, the ducks can deal him as well for defence, you could say the ducks win this deal by a landslide
They don’t have to do anything with Kessler.

6.) 09 Oct 2018 18:54:42
Sorry I meant to say defence prospects, not defence because that would also mess with the cap.

7.) 09 Oct 2018 20:01:04
One more thing, and I know this will start a heated conversation
Gardiner is better, actually WAY better then Savard
He has WAY more trade value, especially with an extension
Gardiner-52 points in 82 games (not injury prone), +9 playing with Zaitsev, $4.05 mill salary
Savard-16 points and +2 in 81 games (not injury prone) last year, $4.25 mill salary
Who would you rather have?
Answer: Gardiner

Just because Gardiner gives up the puck a bit more then average doesn't mean he is a bad defender, all of you act like he is Ryan Murray, which isn't even close in comparison.
Plus most of the time when he does cough up the puck, he recovers it, the Boston game was just an example of what can happen if he coughs it up to one of the best lines in the league and can't recover, which would happen to any normal, or even elite defenceman.

I honestly think this deal is more fair and realistic:
To Columbus:
Gardiner (extension), maybe a "guy" (Marincin, Goat)
To Leafs:
Nutivaara, Milano

But obviously you all don't think he is worth $6 million dollars

Every layer has flaws, but the thing about Gardiner's is that he makes one, recovers the puck, and gets an assist, goal, or makes a beauty pass after, you have to look past his flaws and you can really see what a special ELITE $6 million plus player he really is, he deserves to be treated that way.

The only reason I'm trading this guy so much is because the leafs can't afford his contract next year, but they could afford Nutivaara's, which is looking like a much better trade right now then the Savard (who looks like he is declining in skill) deal.

8.) 09 Oct 2018 21:54:24
Gardiner definitely has more value then savard you may not like Gardiner but the reality is Numbers don’t lie.

9.) 09 Oct 2018 22:35:06
If they can trade perry. But that's a big IF.

10.) 09 Oct 2018 23:06:27
@Habby, your not wrong, it is an if, but if it came down to Perry or Nylander, who would you rather have?
Also, I can see Perry being like a Rick Nash from last year, lots of injuries and a high contract but he puts up points, so maybe Boston trades one of their picks and prospects for him to fill the hole on their right wing side, or a team like Columbus if they lose Panarin may ask about him, or a playoff hopeful like Buffalo who wants to up their offence and maybe trade a guy like Alex Nylander to do it, just a few examples of who would be interested.

11.) 09 Oct 2018 23:23:14
I think Anaheim views Kase as a potential long term Perry replacement. I personally think he’s undervalued here and Anaheim is very high on him. Gardiner has more value than Savard, and numbers may not lie but can be deceiving. got to look at Gardiners future output on a team that isn’t Toronto as what he did before Matthews Marner and Nylander, and those numbers are very different.

12.) 10 Oct 2018 00:01:23
Yeah, Perry won’t be easy to trade. That’s a big dollar amount attached to an aging player who will be coming of a serious injury.

13.) 10 Oct 2018 00:23:22
Anaheim will never be able to trade either Perry or Kessler.

Gardiner and savard are two completely different style players. It’s like comparing apples to oranges. The only thing they have in common is their job title. Except Savard can actually play defense. The only reason Gardiner has 52 points is a + player is because of the forwards in front of him. For most of his career until the likes of Matthews, Marner, and co. came along, Gardiner was deep in the minus. Gardiner is a beneficiary of having such a talented forward group to play with now, not the other way around.

14.) 10 Oct 2018 00:48:53
No Gardiner was a minus because he played for the worst team in the league, then when he joined an actual playoff team, he played like a normal defenceman would.

15.) 10 Oct 2018 03:01:33
@ mostleaf obviously I'd rather nylander lol. That isn't the point plus the perry situation is nothing like nash was last year. Nash was a pending ufa perry has 2 more years after this one at 8.5 mil. The only way the ducks can trade him is if they take back someone else on a hefty contract and therefore they would still be over the cap like I said.

16.) 10 Oct 2018 12:49:13
Anyone else just cringe after reading LeafsGMs analyst of Gardiner. +/ - is team star and the leafs had the worst team in the nhl Gardiner can’t win him self.




themostleaf33's talk posts with other poster's replies to themostleaf33's talk posts


26 Nov 2018 18:21:54
With Hextall out of Philly which teams do you think will try to higher him?

Also, do you think any teams will try to trade for Wayne Simmonds (or other Flyers) now that Philly doesn't have a full-time GM


1.) 26 Nov 2018 18:34:11
I don't know if anyone will be eager to hire him. I think he's one of those guys who is probably a really goo assistant, but maybe it the main guy.
I think Simmonds needs to stay, I know the game has changed quite a bit, but the Flyers need to get back to Flyer hockey. rough and tough. and of course need a goalie.

2.) 26 Nov 2018 19:05:56
Maybe Hextall can go back in net now? Lol because he’s the last time they had a good one (well except when they had bob.

3.) 26 Nov 2018 20:50:39
Toronto should pickup Karl Alzner off waivers from Montreal. When Nikita Zaitsev comes off injury send him down. Karl Alzner would be a got pairing with Ron Hainsey.

4.) 26 Nov 2018 21:51:35
And I would give leafs 2019 1st rounder and a decent prospect to add Simmonds for a run knowing he was going to walk and chase money elsewhere.

Kapanen Matthews Nylander
Hyman Tavares Marner
Marleau Kadri Simmonds
Johnsson Lindholm Brown.

This adds that grit and bit of toughness we lack while still being a very capable offensive group too.

5.) 27 Nov 2018 02:38:17
If Philly is in any position to make playoffs, you can be sure Simmonds will remain on the team.

6.) 27 Nov 2018 04:24:22
I’d give a 1st and a prospect for Simmonds as well Jim. If the leafs don’t add some grit to the line up, that’s when I’d be upset with Dubas. I agree with LeafsGM that if philly is in playoff contention that they will keep him.

7.) 27 Nov 2018 13:46:17
For sure they would keep him then. But if they aren’t in it, they could trade him to a team that has next to no chance of re-signing him like us, and hen bring him back in July if they want him around still.

8.) 27 Nov 2018 20:47:45
Would you rather have Simmonds or Hayes? My thinking is if we get Hayes, we can out Kadri LW, which is a little weaker than RW.

9.) 28 Nov 2018 01:07:08
I’d rather Simmonds over Hayes all day. He’s better, he’s tougher, we have centres so leave Kadri in the middle and it saves $1.25 mill cap space that leafs can use towards maybe a legit veteran depth Dman to help on a deep run.

10.) 28 Nov 2018 04:17:31
If Toronto could add Simmonds just for this year obviously and trade for a top 4 defenseman, then I would consider them contenders. Right now I think they are just a really good offensive team.



06 Nov 2018 00:46:03
Alright I think it's very obvious that Bobrovsky wants out of Columbus, what teams do you think are good fits?

Anyway, in my opinion if I were Carolina I would be trying to go after him rather then Nylander, it would make them instant cup contenders, and they have goalies to spare and give to Columbus so I don't dought it, especially if Nylander is re-signed by the leafs


1.) 06 Nov 2018 03:06:38
The Leafs.

2.) 06 Nov 2018 07:47:35
Goalie Bob has never been good in the playoffs. If he wants Price money I don’t think any team will pay him that!

3.) 06 Nov 2018 11:05:29
I don't even think Price is worth Price money. Price should be getting paidnot more then 8.5 million.

4.) 06 Nov 2018 15:10:47
This wasn't supposed to be a talk about Bobrovsky's future contract, it was supposed to be where you all think he fits, but whatever.

5.) 06 Nov 2018 16:40:45
At 8.5 mill he will be sitting with Nylander.

6.) 06 Nov 2018 21:22:00
Saint Louis for Jake Allen+++ Jake Allen is terrible but there team is a top 5 team with Bob.



31 Oct 2018 16:10:13
Let me just say once players start to return to the lineup, Anaheim is kind of screwed.

Healthy Lineup:



Forwards not included:
Ritchie, Rowney, Aberg, Gibbons, Blandisi, Ludestrom

Defence not included:
Larsson, Schenn

What do you think their plan is?


1.) 31 Oct 2018 16:19:57
Sweet! A post about Anaheim. How refreshing.
They do have a lot of injuries right now don't they. Will they have to put some of those guys on waivers when some return from injury probably? Aberg was a good bandaid waiver pick up by them. Ritchie just signed an extension and I think he has a spot for sure.
Wonder which guys can be sent down without waiver and which have to be put on waiver. Losing guys for nothing (on waivers) always sucks for teams depth. Always nice to just send them down. The difference between one way and two way contracts right there I think.

2.) 01 Nov 2018 15:43:16
I could see them demoting Street, Gibbons, Welinski, Rowney and Lundestrom.

Kase would be in their top 6 imo.

Perry's not going to be back for a while, and when he does, I think he gets third line minutes while Eaves drops to the fourth.

So basically, i'd see their lines as:
*Aberg, Blandisi


3.) 01 Nov 2018 20:35:56
Who is this Comtois? Never even heard of the guy. And he's a top 6 on the Ducks? Cool.

4.) 02 Nov 2018 01:00:11
Maxime Comtois . was on World Jr wasnt he?

5.) 02 Nov 2018 01:54:11
Comtois was like top 3 in rookie scoring before he got injured. Was projected to be like Landeskog when drafted. His stock has been rising like crazy since he was drafted.
Also Steel was sent to the Minors.




themostleaf33's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

24 Nov 2018 17:48:02
I’m surprised this isn’t in fantasy trades.




Click To View This Thread

23 Nov 2018 14:36:42
I honestly think Matthews (along with Kapanen) is going to get a bridge deal. Due to his injuries, the leafs aren't fully aware of what Matthews can do and the amount of stats he can put up in 1 season. Matthews may also want to prove that he is worth more then 11 mill so I don't dought that he would be ok with a bridge deal.




Click To View This Thread

22 Nov 2018 12:38:02
Toronto gets screwed.




Click To View This Thread

20 Nov 2018 12:34:22
Matthews and Gardiner is more then enough, no need to throw in Nylander.




Click To View This Thread

09 Nov 2018 00:48:42
1 you forgot to include Hanafin in your lineup

2 Calgary probably doesn’t make that trade because they already gave up Hamilton.





themostleaf33's talk replies