NHL rumours 2

 

Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

18 Oct 2018 22:59:42
Cal - Valimaki + Jankowski + 1st Rd Pick
Tor - Nylander

Gaudreau - Monahan - Nylander
Tkachuk - Backlund - Lindholm
Frolik - Bennett - Neal
Czarnik - Ryan - Hathaway

Giordano - Brodie
Hanifin - Hamonic
Andersson - Stone

Agree3 Disagree15

18 Oct 2018 23:40:53
Can the Flamers afford to even add around $7M cap?
I think the Flames should deal Gio, Brodie or Hamonic and keep Hannifin and Valmaki. They are starting to get old with Gio, Brodie, Hamonic and Smith in net. Keep the youth.
I think Nylander would look damn good with them tho.

19 Oct 2018 01:13:20
I’d definitely do Nylander for Gio and 1st.

19 Oct 2018 04:11:58
Flames won’t be dealing their young defenders. They are looking great and their forward depth looks good too. Their goaltending looks shaky though.

19 Oct 2018 10:00:40
Very similar to the Brayden Schenn deal that landed Philly Frost and Farabee. I like this trade. It demonstrates very astute cap and asset management. That Valimaki kid is very highly rated. If Calgary doesn’t want to trade him, they also have Andersson, who would be another good choice. Jankowski hasn’t done much up to this point. Big kid that plays a strong game, inexpensive and controllable for a number of years still.

If Toronto doesn’t do this, it would only be because they are wanting someone more proven for that 1RHD spot. But it’s got to be close to what they can expect in terms of a package of prospects/ picks. May have to take a cap dump of some sort too as yup pointed out.

19 Oct 2018 12:13:14
Woah, jankowski scores nearly as much as nylander as a 3rd line as nylander scores playing with Mathews? Plus add a top prospect and a 1st? And then millions of cap space? Just horrible for the flames.

19 Oct 2018 22:55:22
Jankowski .34PPG Nylander .73PPG is not nearly as much shoots. I don’t know enough about Valimaki to have an opinion on the proposal but Nylander is much better than Jankowski at the moment.

20 Oct 2018 17:05:08
I hate the Flamers but really like Jankowski but also know Nylander is a lot better, lol, and it's not really close.
Janko is/ will be a solid third line center.

20 Oct 2018 17:29:21
"Scores" didn't say points, nylander 20 in 82 games, jankowski 17 in 72 games. 1 of these guys had less time on the ice, guess which one, 13:21 to 16:41.

21 Oct 2018 00:45:55
In 400 mins+ playing with Mathews, instead of bennet and Hathaway, safe to assume jankowski could at least match nylanders numbers, he's a few years older yes, nylander has a lot more room to grow but players sometimes regress.

18 Oct 2018 16:12:25
This trade would never happen but you know I just feel like this today
To Leafs:
Bobrovsky, Panarin, Nutivaara
To Columbus:
Anderson, Gardiner, Nylander, 2020 2nd
Anderson+2nd=Bobrovsky
Nylander=Panarin
Gardiner=Nutivaara

Agree1 Disagree17

18 Oct 2018 19:24:23
Never happen like you said. Bobrovsky apparently wants Price money. So taking that into consideration, I’m satisfied with Andersen at $5mill for 3 more years. 5 years control of Nylander for a year of Panarin isn’t worth it. And UFA Gardiner for a 20 year old good Dman makes no sense for CBJ. If they’re losing their star goalie and best forward, what is the point of adding Gardiner?

18 Oct 2018 19:47:29
Nylander is not close to panarin, maybe nylander will be 5 years from now but not close right now, panarin has earned 8+ a year, nylander hasnt.

18 Oct 2018 22:24:32
Read what he said Shoots, he said he prefers having Nylander under control for 5 more years than having Panarin for 1. And he is right.

19 Oct 2018 12:26:12
What he said is they're equal, nylander wants more money that isn't earned, panarin is proven he's earned a contract, nylander has a few years to earn. Much rather have panarin at 6 mil this year than 8 mil nylander. Panarin has much better stats playing with lesser players.

19 Oct 2018 12:40:01
If leafs can sign nylander at 6m-6.5 for 3-5 years, he's worth it, but at his contract demands, he ain't worth nothing. No team is paying a 60 point player 8 million a year long term.

19 Oct 2018 12:55:36
And not responding to Jim if that's what's you're talking about cherry, he always has good input, I get the control of the player but they are not equal, not close, not what I was talking about.

19 Oct 2018 17:39:25
My apologies Shoots, thought you were referring to the 1st response.

19 Oct 2018 19:47:12
Yeah, player for player I’m not debating Nylander equals panarin. Just that panarin will demand $8.5+ mill in July which he will be worth but we can’t afford and we would be competing with 30 teams to try to keep him. Nylander can demand $8.5mill all he wants, Dubas controls his future. So at the end of the day it’s trading off 5 years of a 60-70 pt guy for 1 year of a 75-80 pt guy, when scoring is the least of our worries.

20 Oct 2018 05:01:48
Totally agree jim.

20 Oct 2018 16:12:36
Ya but Nylamder could become a 80-100 point guy. Here's why, how many players have we seen getting 30-60 points season until the age of 23 and then after that getting 60+ points season? Barkov is an example. I think 60 is just the start for Nylander I don't know why people think he can't prosgress more then just a 70 point player. I've never been a fan of leafs but if mtl can get Nylander oh boy what a team. And why would he take less the 7 million? Because Pastnark took a discount 2 years ago so Nylander has to be lower then what Boston plays him? Lol.

18 Oct 2018 15:31:22
Liljegren and Nylander for Dumba and greenway.

Agree4 Disagree11

18 Oct 2018 16:02:44
Interesting but 🤷🏼‍♂️.

18 Oct 2018 18:58:06
Nylander for Dumba is good, but Liljegren > Greenway.

Love Greenway’s size. Would shore up depth position LW. Would be nice to have someone that can actually hit. We would still be keeping Liljegren though even after acquisition of Dumba.

18 Oct 2018 22:51:49
Nylander straight up for Dumba is only good for Toronto, got to give Minny a reason to do it and maybe Liljegren is to to much but I’d take Dumba over Nylander any day.

19 Oct 2018 01:15:45
Would you take Ehlers over Dumba? @Madeindade

Nylander>Ehlers.

19 Oct 2018 04:21:45
Wouldn’t be Liljegren we give them. Probably not Sandin either. I really like Greenway, but not for either of those two fellas.

I wouldn’t offer to take a cap dump, like Foligno, but Leafs can’t afford that. I guess if Minnesota wants more than just Nylander, the trade can be tweaked a little to give them another b prospect/ pick. Liljegren is one of the highest rated RHD prospects in the world. They can’t have him. We would still need him too much.

18 Oct 2018 03:25:06
Mtl Primeau
Det) Hronek or Cholowski

Agree1 Disagree9

18 Oct 2018 15:34:24
As good as primeau has looked I wouldn't trade him as of now. could potentially be a real good starter in 3 years.

18 Oct 2018 02:07:00
Leafs GM Dubas has flown to Switzerland to meet with RFA Nylander to try and get a deal done. Nylander has been training in Sweden all along now and hey agreed on a neutral site in Switzerland to meet.

Source: nhl. discussion Instagram.

Agree3 Disagree10

18 Oct 2018 14:36:10
Who put unbelievable? This is 100% true.

18 Oct 2018 15:35:31
Yeah. Apparently it was just to make it a little more personal. From the reports I heard, Dubas’s Top dollar hasn’t moved but he felt it was important to meet face to face to tell Nylander that they have no intentions of trading him. That’s a main concern of Nylanders, which I understand, is if he signs for less than he feels he’s worth to be a part of a great team and ends up in Arizona or Carolina, he would look like a fool (canes look good though early) .

Also from what Darren Dreger said this morning, this is a meeting with dubas and Nylander only. No assistant GMs standing with dubas and no agents or dad sitting with Nylander. That could make a big difference too. Dubas was apparently a huge sell for Tavares and he can maybe get Nylander to relate to him and see the big picture better without all the other voices and distractions. Hopefully something good comes from it.

17 Oct 2018 21:32:04
Van:Virtanen,Gaudette

Edm:Puljujarvi,2rd2019

Agree3 Disagree16

17 Oct 2018 20:50:07
Chi: Saad

Van: Eriksson (retain 1million), 2nd round pick 2020

Maybe Chicago wants this as Eriksson is still an NHL player and canucks Retain a bit as he hasn’t more years left and then canucks get a guy who could use a change in scenery and add a 2nd to make up a difference in age and skill.

Agree2 Disagree7

18 Oct 2018 00:14:50
Lol no. Chicago really really doesn’t want that.

17 Oct 2018 15:24:03
Mtl:Gallagher,2019

Tor:Nylander@8.2million×8

Agree1 Disagree18

17 Oct 2018 16:23:10
Nope - just not worth that much money.

17 Oct 2018 17:48:26
One of the funniest suggestions yet.

17 Oct 2018 22:49:06
So no from habs?

17 Oct 2018 22:34:42
What’s the 2019? And I’m assuming no habs fan wants to pay Nylander $8.2 million after leafs fans who like him have said for months he’s worth no more than $7 mill max.

17 Oct 2018 22:39:19
2019 what? Doesn't matter habs wouldn't do it anyway.

18 Oct 2018 00:31:58
2 rd pick 2019.

18 Oct 2018 03:22:09
Nylander is prob better than a Gallagher
But Gallagher is the soul carrier of this team
So no from habs.

18 Oct 2018 18:59:38
Neither team makes this trade. Nylander is not worth that much either.

18 Oct 2018 21:53:26
You’re joking right? Nylander put up back to back 60 point seasons and Brendan has never done it once. To say he’s
Not worth him is an absolute joke. Nylander would instantly be mtls best player by a landslide. Leafs pass Gallagher is a little rat that overachieved last year. Also nylanders ceiling destroys Gallagher’s. Wake up clowns.

19 Oct 2018 10:03:03
@ mclraty if he's so good go tell your GM to sign him already so we can stop hearing about it.

17 Oct 2018 12:16:01
BIG Oilers Shakeup;


Oilers: Marchessault

VGK: Lucic, B Prospect (Larkin)

------------

Oilers: Smith, 2020 3rd round pick

OTT: Strome

------------

Oilers: Parayko, 2020 3rd round pick

STL: Yamamoto, Benning, 2019 1st round pick (Top 10 Protected)

-------------

Oilers: Nylander

TO: Larsson, Caggiula

Agree3 Disagree14

17 Oct 2018 13:21:45
Lol Vegas laughs.
No reason for STL to do that.
Not sure I like Smith more than Strome right now. Lucic - Strome - Yamamoto we put together as a third line last night and looked good, had some good chances and I hope that third line sticks for a bit because Drake and Puljujarvi looked good with Drai as well.
And Leafs fans will laugh and bring up Hall and just say that deal sucks because it's for Oilers players.

17 Oct 2018 13:44:47
The 1st trade is terrible for Vegas.

17 Oct 2018 14:43:23
Vegas laughs at you.

Ottawa deal is okay, but i don't think EDM does ir.

If Parayko>>Nylander, that won’t get him either.

Id take thatdeal for Ny imo.

17 Oct 2018 16:50:06
Brutal for Vegas
Dumb for oilers
Easy no from St. Louis
Could see leafs interested.

17 Oct 2018 17:51:36
Oliers don't look good at all what are talk about.

17 Oct 2018 22:47:49
Ya .500 2-2 on a tough road trip Vs tough spinners to start the season. Looking anbsolitly terrible. They should have like 10 wins by now. 4 games into the season. Chill.
Gotta get through the next 6 games vs 100 point teams and then all will hopefully be fine. Very very tough start to the season.

17 Oct 2018 22:31:17
Why is that every shake up for a Canadian team includes parayko for a bunch of crap. seriously

I have stated this on hfboards last fee days and I will state it here.

At the moment defense is an issue for blues. They will not be trading parayko for a mediocre prospect, a small middle six forward and first in 2020 because oilers are goijng to be in bottom 10.

Just stop with parayko.

17 Oct 2018 22:33:29
That Vegas one is terrible lol marchessault has 134 pts in his last 159 games, 27 years old and signed for $5 mill for the next 6 years. lucic is 30, has 86 pts in his last 168 games and makes $6mill for 4 more years. I know points isn’t everything and Lucic does other things that marchessault just can’t, but in today’s NHL the difference between the 2 is not a B prospect lol talks last off-season were it would cost an A prospect or that 2018 1st rounder to ditch Lucics contract. How do you think you can ditch it and get back a far better/ younger player for half the price?!

18 Oct 2018 15:33:18
Yeah I'd have to agree with jim here the Vegas trade is horrendous marchessault is arguably Vegas best player.

17 Oct 2018 06:03:54
Canucks dipetro

Nashville fabbro

Agree5 Disagree9

17 Oct 2018 08:12:20
I like it. A solid goalie prospect for Nashville which I think is their weakest point and a defensemen from their strongest position to bolster Vancouver's weakest point.

 


NHL Trade Rumors


NHL Trade Rumors 3


NHL Trade Rumors 4


NHL Trade Rumors 5


NHL Trade Rumors 6


NHL Trade Rumors 7


NHL Trade Rumors 8


NHL Trade Rumors 9


NHL Trade Rumors 10


 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass