NHL rumours 2


Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

23 Apr 2018 02:17:56

to NYI

to St Louis

Hutton signs with NY and becomes their starter as Halak expires.

Agree1 Disagree6

23 Apr 2018 07:08:05
6th? Is he a UFA? I actually don’t know but if so then maybe. But could imagine blues want to keep Hutton.

23 Apr 2018 14:30:25
After his play this year, would think they play Allen And Hutton as 1A and 1B next year.

24 Apr 2018 00:00:57
My hypothesis is that hutton will want "unproven starter" money, AKA Talbot and Darling money. I'm not so sure St Louis wants to do that. And yes, he is a UFA.

22 Apr 2018 22:57:06
Mtl: Patches (2 million retain)

Wash: Bowey, Burakovski

Mtl gets a 23 left winger who just had a dip season and dosnt seemed to fit quite in Washintons system. don't get me wrong he's good but maybe a change of scenary could be benificial? Bowey is also 23 and just had a good season in the nhl and hopefulky he can build on that and be a good top 4 LHD. Wash pays the price for a player who now would be playing with a real number one center or a good solid center. Or heck even Eller if Backstrom gets hurt. i'd like to know if this is fair for both teams?

Agree1 Disagree13

23 Apr 2018 03:31:34
Well no that’s absolutely idiotic for Washington to make If patches isn’t extended, and even if he is extended that’s still a no from caps imo. Not worth sending away two young talented players for patches.

24 Apr 2018 03:12:32
I think if the Caps replaced one of them with a pick it’d be more fair. Patches with Backstrom/ Kuz would be a 40 goal scorer.

22 Apr 2018 22:42:28



Bruins signs John Carlson to a 7 year 9 million contract

Im not sure if Edm adds tbh. Drai is signed to a big contract for his production but he's still a hella of a center and should be on a team where he would be the number one. Its time for Bergeron to step down a notch and play second line. That way he will last longer and Bruins will be more stable down the middle. This trade makes both team better as Edm gets one of the best young RHD in the league

Agree2 Disagree11

23 Apr 2018 02:20:58
goood godddddd. cmon.

23 Apr 2018 03:01:31
I wouldn't do This if I were Edmonton. and I don't think Boston wants to get rid of Macavoy.
Certain teams seem to have a history at a position. Habs with goalies. Edmonton and Pittsburgh with super star centers. And the Bruins. a superstar Dman. from Shore to Orr, Bourque to Chara. I'm not sold on Macavoy being in that mold yet. but he has the chance yo be the next Boston Stud Dman.
Plus as a Habs fan. I don't wanna see Drais all that much against them. lol.

23 Apr 2018 03:33:24
No from both teams honestly. Boston needs their young dmen more than a centerman and Edmonton needs drat.

23 Apr 2018 08:09:37
You think Boston can trade away an ELC contract for an $8.5M one and then sign a $9M contract?
Boston only has $100K in space right now with only Rick Nash coming off and NYR retained a ton of that so only like $3.9M for him coming off. Holden $1.6. Couple others under $1M but will have to replace with others under $1M. Where is all this cap space for Boston to add $17.5M for two guys? Seriously you just don't think before you post. You're always so far off its hilarious.

22 Apr 2018 23:28:47
Edmonton Oilers:

- Sam Bennett

Calgary Flames:

- 2018 2nd

I think Calgary should call it quits on the Bennett project. They also have no picks in the first two rounds this year and could look to trade back in.

Sam Bennett could be Strome's replacement if Oilers don't want to bring him back.

Agree4 Disagree8

23 Apr 2018 01:31:16
They won’t trade Bennett to Edmonton.

23 Apr 2018 02:27:31
he's 21 years old. some high level players take more time; see hasek, hoffman, burns. that would be a very short-sighted move that would also have payoff later than now, which is the opposite of what calgary is looking for right now.

23 Apr 2018 03:34:19
Very Interesting but can’t see Calgary giving up on him although I am also not very high on Bennett, but I think Calgary says no.

23 Apr 2018 18:53:12
If Calgary is to say adios to the Bennett project. I don't see them trading him inbthe same division. he's very young. and has big upside. whether he reaches that or not. I don't think Treliving wants to see it happen jus up the road in Edmonton.
Maybe my Habs could make a pitch.

22 Apr 2018 21:12:45
to Dallas

to Toronto

Toronto isn't going to resign JVR, and Dallas would be well served to sign him, as their wing depth is fairly putrid. Getting exclusive rights to him may be worth it, especially to get someone like that to play with Faksa or Spezza.

Agree2 Disagree9

22 Apr 2018 21:33:24
Cant really see Toronto trading his rights and I can’t see Dallas being that interested in using a considerable amount of cap space on another forward, they should be looking at their defense and depth.

24 Apr 2018 00:02:00
Their wing depth really isn't very good.

22 Apr 2018 18:16:35
Mtl weber patch price

Canucks elias petterson

Agree1 Disagree16

22 Apr 2018 19:15:40
Lol ya good trade.

22 Apr 2018 20:01:13
Habs add all draft picks for next 4 years.
Canucks add a 4th rounder in 2026.and maybe a guided tour of StanleyPark.

22 Apr 2018 20:39:57
Lol pretty sure canucks don't have the cap space to take Prices (10,5), Weber (7.5)Patches (4.5 but surely 6+ million next year) and at the expense of they're best center prospect on top of that. Maybe something around Weber (10 % retain) and Hudon for Petterson but not sure Vancouver should go down that route tbh.

22 Apr 2018 20:42:50
lol no thanks, Pettersson is seriously looking like he could be a franchise player, you can keep Weber and Price’s horrendous contracts and let them run you into the ground, it’s what MTL deserves for its incompetence.

22 Apr 2018 22:42:24
Where are you going to get all that money
Please elude me.

23 Apr 2018 04:17:20
Jim benning goes to east hasting and smiles like a 🍩 is where he gets the dumb dumb how else we he get it lol this post i a joke they would add chucky and galherger and retain all there salary and next 100 first rd pick and maybe a 7 to even thing out.

23 Apr 2018 08:11:43
Lol @ colt talking about a team not being able to take so much cap but then posts Boston trading for Draisitle and signing Carlson for $9M. 🙄🙄🙄. Clueless.

23 Apr 2018 14:14:13
Well let's see shall we. Nash = 7.5 million = pouff gone after this summer then Beleskey will probably be bought out a couple million off and then add some tweaking around and you got the space. I know creativity ain't your strong suit but give it a shot and the world will await you bud.

23 Apr 2018 16:45:36
You know Beleskey isn’t in Boston anymore, right? He’s a ranger?

23 Apr 2018 17:04:27
Belesky went to the Rangers in the Nash deal. And the Rangers retained on Nash. Boston only has like $3.9M of Nash's contract on their books.
Who needs creativity when you know the facts. Lol.

21 Apr 2018 21:18:09
Toronto: Connor Brown and 3rd 2018

Calargry: Sam Bennet

Toronto: Gets a high potential replacement for bozak. With the fallout floor being similar to browns production.

Calargry: gives a stuggling player a change of scenery and gets back a young cost controlled player who would get more minutes in Calargry.

Agree5 Disagree12

21 Apr 2018 21:27:45
I think if toronto trades it's for D.

21 Apr 2018 22:14:17
Calgary has enough Bottom 6 players.

21 Apr 2018 23:40:59
Not the worst, but Babcock loves browns game and they just locked him up on a cheap deal. Don’t think they trade brown for Bennett, but doubt even more they add a pick to do it.

22 Apr 2018 00:58:55

Your not upgrading from a bottom 6 forward to a top 6 forward if your omly trading away a bottom 6 forward.

22 Apr 2018 13:34:05
I know what people say but Bennett still has potential and I’d rather have him than Brown because of that potential and if Calgary were to trade him they’d be better off putting him in a package to get a higher end player than to get another sure fire career bottom 6 player. Calgary has way to many of those, we either need better players or players that could eventually move into the top 6.

22 Apr 2018 14:07:05
Brown would be first line on Calargry lol. He’s better then Ferland, Brouwer and Versteeg. He certainly has potential to be a top 6 player.

22 Apr 2018 15:42:35
Brown hasn’t shown that he’s more than a bottom 6 player. They can play him 1st line but he’ll never be a true first line player. Like I said better to package Bennett to get a real first liner.

22 Apr 2018 16:18:35

Well I don't know how you would expect Brown to show he's a top 6 player when the two RW ahead of him are Nylander and Marner. Besides, Toronto doesn't really have a top 6, they roll 3 strong lines pretty equally and their fourth is their fourth. Its also Browns 2nd year in the league and he scored 20 in his rookie season, then got bounced around all over the place this season and played substantial portion of the season on the 4th line because Babcock refused to demote or even sit Komarov, yet he still managed to score 14 goals. Too early to make a comment that he's not proven. He needs consistent linemates next year and then we should have a better idea of what he is and isn't.

22 Apr 2018 16:25:03
Similar players ones 21 and one is 24 that's the reason leafs would add and I think it would have to be more then a 3rd tbh.

23 Apr 2018 14:18:12
Brown and Bennett aren't close in value, Bennett is in the same boat as Jesse Puljarvi. Both really talented, drafted 4th overall but need more time to develop. Funny how people value Puljuravi like crazy comparing to Perry in his prime, but Bennett is a surefire bust and bottom 6 forward? At least he had 1 decent season so far with 36 points. Not sure what's in the water out west, but as a plumber I am intrigued.

23 Apr 2018 14:29:37
The difference between Bennett and Brown is a second at the very least.

21 Apr 2018 19:49:33
to Pittsburgh
Pacioretty (some salary retained, probably not max)

to Montreal

Agree0 Disagree13

21 Apr 2018 19:52:57
nevermind they definitely do max salary retention.

21 Apr 2018 20:49:48
I think Habs can get more. and I don't want to see Deslauriers traded, he may not be a star, but he is a really good 4th liner who bring a lot of energy, some toughness and the odd clutch goal. his value however isn't measured in stats.
Patches had a bad season. but I believe he can still bring back a better return . and I think Sprong is destined to be a top scorer in his career, however at the AHL level.

22 Apr 2018 20:41:33
I agree that Patches could get more but saying Sprong his destined for the ahl is ridiculous. he's domanted every he played (of course not the nhl yet) and played at the nhl at 18 year old and played this year 8 games and had 3 points. After having a ppg in the ahl this year I think next uear as a 22 year old he could get 50+ points i'd given the chance to play in a top 6 role. That won't happrn in Pitts so i'd be all for acquiring his services and hoping for the best. Trades not terrible imo if you value Sprong properly.

21 Apr 2018 19:43:49
to Florida

to Buffalo

Agree2 Disagree9

21 Apr 2018 20:51:10
Buffalo can get bettet than that. O'Reilly is a top 2 way center in the league. (I didn't say top center) .

21 Apr 2018 21:26:12
bjugstad is 25 and coming off a 50 point season.

21 Apr 2018 12:40:41
Minnesota: Zach Parise ( 33 year old signed 8 more years at 7.1 mil ), Jared Spurgeon and 1st rd 2018

Montreal: Weber

Minnesota: rids them selves of a horrible Parise contract and brings in a number 1 dman and reunites one of the greatest D pairs ever in the NHL. Suter and Weber.

Montreal: gets younger and Spurgeon is a very good replacement as a solid 2nd dman. The Canadians can hope for an compliance buy out in the next CBA meeting for Parise. IMO after his surgery Parise is much better he can easily be a 65 Point player again if he stays healthy he could fit in the Canadians system.

Agree2 Disagree12

21 Apr 2018 15:15:09
Parise is done being a 65 point player. I agree he could still be usefull as a second third line winger and maybe on the pp. I would take thus from mtl not sure Minny would tho.

21 Apr 2018 15:36:04
that contract is horrible no no no.


NHL Trade Rumors

NHL Trade Rumors 3

NHL Trade Rumors 4

NHL Trade Rumors 5

NHL Trade Rumors 6

NHL Trade Rumors 7

NHL Trade Rumors 8

NHL Trade Rumors 9

NHL Trade Rumors 10

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass