31 Jul 2020 19:53:26
Winnipeg- Bryan Little ( LTIR-retired ), Jack Roslivic, Kristen Vaisalianen/Logan Stanley and 1st 2020

Chicago- Dylan Strome and Connor Murphy/Duncan Keith( hometown player 1 million retained )

Winnipeg- Brings in a 2c of position of need whos playmaking ability would compliment Laine perfectly and either Connor Murphy who is a better version of Demelo or Hometown boy Duncan Keith who can still play the top pair no MemarcusJoe he's not washed up he still plays 25 minutes a game. He might be able to drop Morrisey to the 2nd pair.

Chicago- Gets a 2C replacement, a decent prospect and the main piece is the mid 1st. The Black hawks need some cap space.

1.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 20:21:24
Easy no from Winnipeg.

Murphy is RD, so he'd be 3rd pairing if the Jets re-sign Demelo as speculated, in other words, not needed. Keith is too old and his contract is too long to even consider giving up anything for.

If Little goes on LTIR or retires, there's no reason for the Jets to trade him.

That leaves Vesalainen, Roslovic and a 1st for Strome. Which is a ridiculously massive overpay by the Jets for an iffy 2C. If Strome was available for something reasonable like a 2nd or mid range prospect, maybe.

Jets pass.

2.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 21:14:46
Why would Demelo play over Murphy? And if you think you can get a 2c for a 2nd you’re out to lunch half of a season of Kevin Hayes returned a 1st and Lemeaux who is better then both Stanley and Vaesilainenen.

3.) 31 Jul 2020
31 Jul 2020 21:36:02
I know player evaluation is your weak suit vbbb, but Demelo would play over Murphy because he's better. That is beside the point however. The point is Murphy isn't needed if we sign Demelo, so why waste the assets.

Once again you want me to argue a statement I never made. I didn't say the Jets could get a 2C for a second. I said the Jets would be interested in Strome, possibly, if he was available for a reasonable price like a second and that the Jets wouldn't be interested in Strome for the astronomically ridiculous overpay you suggested.

You just made an overly complex trade offer to include pieces that Jets have no need to trade and no need to acquire, to feebly try to justify a large package of young assets coming out of Winnipeg.

4.) 01 Aug 2020
31 Jul 2020 22:29:53
Vb no trade is good enough for memarcusjoe. Even if you offered McDavid for Laine he would still say no.

5.) 01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020 01:22:47
Yeah the leafs would be interested in Schifele if he was available for a reasonable price like a 2nd. Saying Dylan Demelo is better then Connor Murphy is like saying Alex Kerfoot is better then Schifele but we’ll go with that.

6.) 01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020 01:51:42
Vesalainen = bust
Roslovic = sucks
Stanley = bust
Murphy > DeMelo
Strome > 1st
Kieth is better than nothing

If you have Murphy you don't need to sign DeMelo. Duh.

This trade so heavily favors Winnipeg that only a Jets troll would say no. What a load of crap joetroll is.

7.) 01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020 03:30:59
I honestly think Keith might have a bit of value if he has like 1.5million maybe 2 retain.

8.) 01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020 04:52:32
Uhhh.
No from Winnipeg.

Not even sure why this is up for discussion?

9.) 01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020 08:34:44
Good god is that horrible for the Jets!

10.) 01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020 14:21:21
The Leaf trolls think that this is a good trade for the Jets? No wonder the Leafs haven't won a cup in 53 years.

11.) 01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020 15:25:20
It is funny how the Leaf fans don't have anything intelligent to debate with. It's just "wah, wah, you don't like my poorly thought out trade. I'm going to stomp my little feet and go home. "

12.) 01 Aug 2020
01 Aug 2020 21:31:19
Great now you know how everyone else feels listening to you rant about the jets.

13.) 03 Aug 2020
03 Aug 2020 18:48:56
I posted quite clearly why this trade heavily favors Jets. Trading a bunch of busts and fringe players along with an injured and a retired Little won't get you useful players like a 2C back. Keep your trash.

14.) 04 Aug 2020
04 Aug 2020 02:53:44
@SLF

I don't think you understand what the term ''bust'' means in hockey. Re-learn, then come back to this thread.