13 Mar 2021 18:19:07
Sharks Trade
EKane (50% of Contract Retained)

Toronto Trades
Kerfoot


Ok Sharks I am hearing want to rid themselves of EKane, to do so I believe they would have to retain half of the rest of his contract.

Leafs add a Top 6 for sure but with all his issues is it worth the gamble ? Maybe it is or maybe it would be a huge mistake idk.


Thoughts ?

1.) 13 Mar 2021
13 Mar 2021 19:34:12
Thoughts? That you need help.

2.) 14 Mar 2021
13 Mar 2021 21:39:11
Never happen.

Sharks would have to be out of their minds to trade Kane for Kerfoot even without the retention. If Toronto wants Kane they'll have to start with something a lot better than Kerfoot and add from there.

Nylander for Kane straight up might interest San Jose.

3.) 14 Mar 2021
13 Mar 2021 22:35:22
Why on Earth would SJ do this?

4.) 14 Mar 2021
13 Mar 2021 22:47:30
I second that thought.

5.) 14 Mar 2021
14 Mar 2021 02:38:27
SJS is not retaining 50% of a 7mil @ 5 year contract, there’s just no way in heck.

6.) 14 Mar 2021
14 Mar 2021 11:37:30
I think everyone needs to google Evander Kane to understand why SJ might be willing to take whatever for him, it's not what he does on the ice, it's off the ice.

7.) 14 Mar 2021
14 Mar 2021 13:59:38
Pinball I think we’re all aware of his financial troubles, but what kind of message does an organization send its players if they trade them for dirt when they are struggling; it’s like cutting your brother out of your life when he’s struggling with an addiction. The Sharks should restructure Kanes deal this offseason to help him with his financials and get him through this difficult time.

8.) 14 Mar 2021
14 Mar 2021 14:51:57
Is this what its come to? The only way the Leafs can even sniff a Stanley Cup is if all 30 other teams just gift them more talented players and get absolutely fleeced in the returns?

9.) 14 Mar 2021
14 Mar 2021 19:47:01
Kane, yes, an excellent player when he's not lugging all that baggage around, he would just be a distraction in the locker room.