Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

22 Dec 2019 06:01:27

Drew DOUGHTY + Top prospect

To LA:
Jonathon TOEWS + Duncan KEITH

Two teams moving three unloveable contracts trying to make a huge shakeup.

Agree2 Disagree19

22 Dec 2019 12:28:55
Dumbest thing I’ve read in awhile.

22 Dec 2019 13:03:19
No from la. Kings will be looking to add prospects, not reduce them.

22 Dec 2019 15:34:14

Sorry, did I forget to mention this was an actual rumor posted, on an actual web site, by an actual analyst, who actually gets paid for his opinion? Oh yeah. You investigate these guys. I forgot.

22 Dec 2019 16:31:51
HockeyFanatic, what's the source then? that sounds pretty unbelievable. i'd love doughty on chicago but i doubt this would happen. why would LA give up a top prospect and their number 1 d for 2 aging players.

22 Dec 2019 19:05:29
Yikes, that’s awful. LA says no thanks and laughs while hanging up.

23 Dec 2019 00:58:23
VB you’ve said a lot more dumb things in the last while. Lol. Good one.

23 Dec 2019 13:44:37
Doughty has a big contract yes, but in my opinion he gets a better return for L. A than that.

23 Dec 2019 15:11:06
This was reported by Eklund, he doesn’t have a great track record.

23 Dec 2019 15:15:00
Lmao any half intelligent person knows Eklund is a clown and is the exact opposite as a source. Yup has more inside analysis then that clown.

23 Dec 2019 15:16:07
Hahaha this guy’s “source” is Eklund 😂 oh man.

23 Dec 2019 15:17:52
Eklund posted it. He’s a credible source for rumours isn’t he?

23 Dec 2019 15:18:22
Lol. HockeyFanatic calling Eklund an actual hockey "analyst".

23 Dec 2019 15:21:30
And so we are supposed to just think because you make a somewhat funny, though more lame, and oft repeated, response that we all bow down to the word of Vertius. These words are meaningless. Blowing hot air. Like my last fart. You know what the most important question, and by far, the most asked question is don’t you? Why? So tell me, why is Mr. Eklund’s proposal so bad? This is a man who makes significantly more than you for his hockey opinion after all. So what makes you think your words mean more than his to me?

23 Dec 2019 15:22:42
It's from one of the biggest hacks on the net. Eklund from hockey buzz that guy hasn't been right yet lol.

23 Dec 2019 15:23:01
My post didn't go through but it’s definitely Eklund and his credibility is about as high as a monkeys.

23 Dec 2019 15:49:06
Lots of people come to this site specifically to read plagiarized trade rumors from other sites.

24 Dec 2019 09:24:13
Dont think I've ever read anything that was true from eklund he's basically an internet troll that people pay. Anyone on this site has as much creditability as him.

24 Dec 2019 18:35:16
This trade is wack. Stop defending it. there's no reason in the universe that EITHER team would want to pull this off. Fans would riot in both cities.

Fanatic: a person filled with excessive and single-minded zeal, especially for an extreme religious or political cause.

So basically you're a nut job and nobody can convince you that you're wrong. I'll keep that in mind the next time you drop a garbage trade proposal.

25 Dec 2019 04:01:54
It’s nice to see you took the time too look up the definition of fanatic. Too bad you didn’t bother to look up the spelling of WHACK at the same time. Your argument loses merit when you use a dictionary to attack me on the definition of a word in my my name but can’t be bothered to spell properly. Considering spellchecker tells you whack is spelled wrong, you deliberately ignored it, making yourself look lazy at the same time. I thought it was funny when you brought up the whole fanatic point though. That gets bonus for originality.



Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass