Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

16 Nov 2023 21:54:01
Lindholm and Tanev both 50% retained.


Kulak, McLeod , 2 1sts, 3 2nds, Bourgault, Campbell, Lavoie

Lindholm for 1st and 2nd
Tanev for Kulak, McLeod 2nd
To take Campbell- 1st,2nd, Bourgault, Lavoie

Agree1 Disagree16

16 Nov 2023 23:36:37
wow. that's a lot for 2 UFAs.

17 Nov 2023 00:26:03
Edmonton also gets out of a awful Campbell contract.

17 Nov 2023 14:23:43
I guess I would be somewhat surprised if EDM & CGY come together on a major trade.

They’ve made 3 smaller ones in their history, but I think it would be challenging to complete a transformative trade with your provincial rival.

17 Nov 2023 15:26:46
Campbell and a 1st/ 2nd for Markstrom. Lol same style as the Lucic Neal trade.

18 Nov 2023 15:31:45
Except Lucic and Neal were serviceable NHLers and Campbell isn’t even a serviceable AHLer. Markstrom is also better then all 3. 4 1sts is the price to dump Campbell.

19 Nov 2023 15:22:12
No team would ever trade 4 1st over buying him out. Lol.

19 Nov 2023 17:58:13
No contender wants dead cap space of a buy out his buy out is long enough for rebuilders to cause an issue down the road. Oilers are in a tough spot.

19 Nov 2023 20:50:48
- Agree with EBS.

- Some rosters just have too many mistakes to fix with trades, buyouts or both.

- A hard cap means there’s less room for error than ever.

- Eventually you get to a point where you can’t fill one hole without creating another.



Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass