16 Feb 2015 20:49:18
Leafs - Kings

Justin Williams, Valentin Zykov, Tanner Pearson
for
Dion Phaneuf, Sam Carrick, 4th

Leafs - Penguins

Daniel Winnik, Olli Jokinen (1 million retained)
for
2nd, 2016 2nd

Leafs - Islanders

Justin Williams,4th for 1st

Leafs - Panthers

Aleksandar Barkov, Jonathon Huberdeau, Gudbranson, 2nd
for
Phil Kessel, Tyler Bozak

JVR - KADRI - HUBERDEAU
PEARSON - BARKOV - PANIK
KOMAROV - HOLLAND - KOZUN
MCLAREN - SMITH - BOOTH

GUDBRANSON - RIELLY
GARDINER - POLAK
ROBIDAS - HOLZER

BERNIER, REIMER

Leafs drop to top 3 pick


1.) 17 Feb 2015
Panthers GM just said earlier today they won't move Huberdeau, Ekblad nor Barkov. Don't see them doing that trade for Kessel


2.) 17 Feb 2015
All of these trades are ridiculously in favour of the Leafs. No to all of them.


3.) 17 Feb 2015
Umm wow sooo Ya, let's start with for the 193rd time on this site NYI don't gave their first rounder!!! Omg if u don't know hockey don't post! Then stop with the Toronto trades everything they gave for all the best young players on an up and coming team, why would Florida a team on its way to the playoffs trade it's entire core to a team that is sucking for its players who are under performing? This make ZERO sense and finally stop with the one sided Toronto trades, this is why people on here rant about so many leafs fans because of posters like you! There a regret logical leafs posters who suffer because of others stupidity


4.) 17 Feb 2015
17 Feb 2015 02:53:51
Like all except last one


5.) 17 Feb 2015
If LA is taking on Phaneufs contract, they have to ship out a long term contract as well.

I think 2 2nds is too much for Winnik/Jokinen. Jokinen does not add much value. And winnik getting a 2nd and a 3rd like Lebrun said will most likely come down a bit.

So a second and a decent prospect or a 4th/5th could be realistic


6.) 17 Feb 2015
Then people wonder why chirp says the things he does


7.) 17 Feb 2015
17 Feb 2015 10:34:49
Was about to say the exact same thing, hab.


8.) 17 Feb 2015
^ I think part of the problem is that you can read 4 or 5 trades you think are bad (and believe me there are some bad ones, but it's still your own opinion and bias that are informing that view) on this page and then make a statement like this "all leaf fans are deluded and overvalue their players".

I have no problem carving someone up for making a poor trade proposal. I don't even have a problem with someone saying there are a lot of bad trade proposals from a certain fan base, BUT the generalized statements (which seems counter to things I hear from fans on the radio and other fan boards) is where I have the issue.