NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts


Websjac's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



Websjac's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Websjac's Posts



To Websjac's last 5 rumours posts


To Websjac's last 5 talk posts


To Websjac's last 5 rumour replies


Websjac's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Websjac's rumours posts


07 Apr 2021 18:25:35
As an adaptation to one of the trades

Calgary receives Eichel + Reinhart

Philly receives Gaudreau + 2021,2022 2nds via Calgary

Buffalo receives Monahan + Konechny + Bennett + 2021 Calgary first

Gaudreau has been rumoured to go to Philly and would likely resign there. They've been struggling as of lately and could use a change-up to get back in playoff contention. They also get 2 2nds.

Calgary gets their big centre star to play with Tkachuk as well as a decent 2 or 3C. They give up their valuable first and 2 2nds, but arrange a competing team for next year.

Buffalo receives three players all under 26 years old that probably actually make the team better imo as more roster spots are filled, as well as a valuable first to select a good prospect.


1.) 07 Apr 2021 19:33:18
I think if Eichel is moved, a top A type of prospect is going to be in the deal heading to Buffalo.

2.) 07 Apr 2021 19:42:43
Holy that’s terrible for Buffalo I wouldn’t give eichel for that alone. Nylander, Robertson, Sandin, 1st 2021, 1st 2022 and 1st 2023 for Eichel.

3.) 07 Apr 2021 20:17:58
@sosahabs yeah fair enough
@Nylander tbh I think Buffalo would be dumb to not accept that offer you laid out.

4.) 07 Apr 2021 20:30:58
Reinhart wouldn't be a center in Calgary he'd be a top 6 RW. Likely on the 1st line unless they pick up another better RW.

Also this has Calgary paying too much and Philly receiving way too much for Konecney. Philly should be giving a pick and Calgary trading either a 1st or 2 2nds.

5.) 07 Apr 2021 21:23:28
@Nylander Yeah sure why wouldn't the Leafs cripple themselves for the next decade with yet another $10 mil a year center?

o. O.

6.) 07 Apr 2021 21:29:10
Mind you if Philly adds Patrick to their end of the deal, Calgary could give up a 1st and two 2nds.

7.) 08 Apr 2021 02:46:39
I also don't see him being happy in a Canadian city,
I could see Eichel as a King. some sort of deal with Byfield being the "A Proapect" coming to Buffalo. As well as other peices changing hands between the 2 teams.

8.) 08 Apr 2021 12:14:47
Calgary gets fleeced.

9.) 08 Apr 2021 17:28:46
@sosahabs the problem I see is say he gets traded for an A prospect like Byfield and it doesn’t work out (say Byfield is a bust), that looks awful because u didn’t get anything.
Monahan + Konechny is a start to a top 2nd line and Bennett a 3C. The first brings in a B+ prospect.



07 Apr 2021 00:51:06
Just because I'd love to see both Tkachuks on my sens,

Ott: M Tkachuk

Cal: D Batherson, L Brown, L Thomson, R Greig, Ott and Clb 2021 2nds (likely both 32-45 range), 2022 Ott 1st (top 10 protected), some late picks

Well also happily give you Matt Murray or Mike Rielly if you'd take them haha

Prolly not enuf but maybe


1.) 07 Apr 2021 05:08:59
It probably cost them Batherson, (2021) 1st, Sanderson and maybe more tbh. Brown doesn’t hold much value. Not enough quality, too much quantity.

2.) 07 Apr 2021 13:26:32
I'd love to see the brothers playing together too but I'd much prefer trading Gaudreau and a 1st for Brady.

3.) 07 Apr 2021 17:46:32
@Mornix Ottawa how zero chance resigning Gaudreau, its pretty much guaranteed imo that he’s going to go to Philly when his contract is up. Brady is already better than Matthew as well, so i really don't see Calgary having any assets to get him.
Keep in mind this deal is a 22-year old w 23 points, 2 recent first round picks, 2 2nds that are probably worth a late first (2 times 30-40 can usually get 25-30), a future first that will likely be valuable and a project in L Brown that may or may not pan out.

4.) 08 Apr 2021 20:51:37
Are you crazy? Take out Grieg and ottawas 1st. The rest as is should be well more than enough. They are already getting a quality top 6 guy in Batherson, a future top 4 defense in Thompson, what most league wide STILL consider a high end prospect in L. Brown and 2 2nds lol Matthew is solid yes but more than that? Let alone a likely lottery pick this and next year, and a solid future top 6 former 1st in grieg on top? You're talking McDavid level value or near to it which I'm sorry to tell you, Matthew is just NOT!



04 Apr 2021 15:07:09
Alright Nylander you said you'd take this one

Tor: Getzlaf
Ana: Hyman


1.) 04 Apr 2021 17:39:41
Wouldn’t want to move Hyman as he’s the heart and sole of the leafs and will probably resign under 3 mil even though he could get 5 on open market. ( comes from one of the richest families in Canada)

2.) 04 Apr 2021 17:52:01
You said you would on a previous post Nylander. Backtracking now?

3.) 04 Apr 2021 20:37:28
In a vacuum I’d take Getzlaf.



31 Mar 2021 17:27:45
Islanders need a LW to fill Lee's spot and could be a great fit for Hall. After winning the Pageau trade last year by a long shot, they may be enticed to try the same thing this year.

Hall with 50% retention for Islanders 2021 1st, 2021 3rd and the required cap in players (don't feel like researching this). Their first will likely be 25-32 so it isn't too valuable to them and it also helps cover the retention by Buffalo.


1.) 31 Mar 2021 20:44:09
“Helps cover retention for Buffalo” there is no scenario where hall isn’t traded at 50% retained.

2.) 01 Apr 2021 16:44:57
Nylander I get that, you don’t need to bring it up every 5 seconds.



29 Mar 2021 05:31:56
Another goalie trade option;

LAK: FAndersen

TOR: Quick and Lafello

La gets the better goalie in the deal, but Toronto addresses two needs and gets the 2018 Kings tandem.


1.) 29 Mar 2021 10:10:29
Interesting. I don’t mind it honestly. It’s different for sure but it’s not bad.

2.) 29 Mar 2021 12:31:21
Value may be close in a different situation but why would LA give up a decent forward and a veteran goalie for an injured 31 year old on an expiring contract?

They’re still building, If they’re moving assets out, it’s for piece to help the build. Not a goalie that will sign with the highest bidder in a cpl months.

3.) 29 Mar 2021 19:46:43
@Sampson Andersen still has a bunch of good years left and goaltending is key to a good rebuild (look at Buffalo if you don’t believe me) . Quick is likely going to retire within a couple years and joining Toronto would give him one last shot at another cup. Maybe LA asks for a pick as well for Lafello, but I don’t believe they’ll get any crazy offers for him that would make them turn this down.

4.) 30 Mar 2021 15:10:48
First of all it’s Iafallo, not Lafello. I don’t usually correct spelling but since you like to say how stupid and clueless other people are on here, I think I will point out that you don’t even know the name of the guy you’re trying to trade.

Secondly, I’m aware Andersen probably has good years left. I’m aware that goaltending is important for a rebuild. I’m also aware that Andersen is a UFA and has no allegiance to LA. Meaning he can go anywhere he wants in a cpl months and if another team offers a single penny more, that’s where he’ll likely go.

So why would LA help Toronto with a decent goalie and a good middle six winger for a goalie that, if healthy, will do nothing but screw up their odds at a higher draft pick and then leave in free agency? There is zero logic to that.




Websjac's talk posts with other poster's replies to Websjac's talk posts


03 Mar 2021 16:19:24
Out of curiosity, what would be a realistic package for Buffalo to give up to move off the skinner contract.

9M AAV through to 2027.


1.) 04 Mar 2021 03:29:51
Way too much like Cozens and multiple 1sts.

2.) 04 Mar 2021 04:28:55
This could possibly be the worst UFA contract in history. there have been some really bad ones. , but this could potentially be the worst. I don't know how Buffalo gets out of this, I don't think its possible.
Can you guys think of other examples UFA signings that have been this bad.? Maybe the Erickson one is up there , Alzners was bad as well. I like the Lucic one more than Skinner one .

3.) 04 Mar 2021 11:54:54
My thoughts on this is that the adds would have to be significant and more than they would like to give.

So chances are they are better off holding onto it until the term is lower for teams to consider.

The other factor is how many teams who can afford his salary and surround him with the right environment to motivate him.

Buffalo doesn’t seem to be able to motivate him to produce what he’s capable of. So you have to wonder which teams can.

4.) 04 Mar 2021 17:59:14
At this point they need to fire their coach and they need to play skinner with the big boys and try and get him going and maybe you can get rid of him but it’s still going to cost and arm and leg.




Websjac's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

20 Apr 2021 13:16:24
I think more teams should stick to 4-5 year max contracts seeing how fast they can become awful.




Click To View This Thread

17 Apr 2021 14:03:41
I don’t really see an Eichel to Calgary trade being possible. Calgary has a lot of assets (Gaudreau, Lindholm, Monahan, Hanifin, etc), but they’re not valuable to a rebuilding team who will be looking for high quality prospects (which Calgary doesn’t have) and star young players.




Click To View This Thread

16 Apr 2021 17:58:16
With Lindqist as well.




Click To View This Thread

16 Apr 2021 16:55:57
NotaCasual the difference is Kakko is a much better prospect than anything Calgary has to offer.
I think this one is pretty accurate in terms of value, it would take an offer like this to get Eichel.
I could see Kakko, Georgiev, Strome and 2 firsts.




Click To View This Thread

15 Apr 2021 11:13:46
Buffalo would definitely pass. Not really much value in terms of prospects - all late picks who haven’t exploded or added much value to their stock.
I think NYR can and will make the best offer for Eichel.





Websjac has no Talk Replies