NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts
Into the Wild's Profile
Into the Wild's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Into the Wild's Posts
To Into the Wild's last 5 rumours posts
To Into the Wild's last 5 banter posts
To Into the Wild's last 5 rumour replies
Into the Wild's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Into the Wild's rumours posts
08 Jun 2016 02:29:09
Montreal:
Galchenyuk, 2nd
Minnesota:
1st (15th overall), Brodin, Granlund
It could be Dumba instead of Brodin if Montreal adds a 4th.
1.) 08 Jun 2016 05:11:53
Habs take either deal.
2.) 08 Jun 2016 06:03:43
Imo Wild lose.
3.) 08 Jun 2016 06:28:39
Way too much for Galchenyuk.
4.) 08 Jun 2016 11:46:03
If Montreal think they can get a better player than galchenyuk at that pick then they do it but the only place on their team I believe is lacking is forward and your trading away your 2nd/ 3rd best forward for more defence? value doesn't matter it doesn't help their team.
5.) 08 Jun 2016 21:51:56
Not a bad offer but Habs pass, Galchenyuk is just now starting to unleash his full potential and with the window being opened now they can't afford to trade their number 1 C and potentially their best forward for a pick who won't be as good or NHL ready next season.
6.) 11 Jun 2016 05:30:07
Habs pass, they finally have legit No. 1 centre in Galchenyuk: 30 goals last season and he's only getting started.
06 Jun 2016 16:11:33
Min:
Brodin, Zucker, a 2nd rounder 2018
Edm:
RNH.
1.) 06 Jun 2016 17:00:27
why 2nd from 2018?
2.) 06 Jun 2016 17:21:44
@McJesus
That's the next time the Wild have a 2nd round pick. (No second this season or next)
3.) 06 Jun 2016 17:45:20
Heats, but all good. Still in my opinion Wild might be overpaying with Zucker, but I would take it.
Into the Wild's banter posts with other poster's replies to Into the Wild's banter posts
07 Jun 2016 18:32:07
Montreal:
Galchenyuk, 2nd
Minnesota:
Brodin, Granlund, 15 overall.
1.) 07 Jun 2016 20:22:30
Not bad.
2.) 08 Jun 2016 00:09:30
Holy poop! Take out the 15th overall maybe.
3.) 08 Jun 2016 02:12:16
I'd do this if I'm the Habs.
4.) 08 Jun 2016 05:58:51
I'd say no from Wild's point of view. I think Granlund is proving a more effective C thus far. Galchenyuk is a good player but his skills at center have been lacking to this points. Meanwhile Granlund is already poised to be the new #1 in Minne.
Into the Wild's rumour replies
06 Sep 2016 15:54:28
Most easy nos from the other teams, especially the Calgary one.
28 Jul 2016 04:07:03
Dumba >>>>>>> Reinhart, 4th
Nuge > Coyle.
27 Jul 2016 21:04:46
No one wants Girardi, no matter how much you retain.
27 Jul 2016 20:53:49
Couturier has proven nothing offensively.
We no longer need a center unless it's a number one center.
And thinking that right now Tuch has a good shot at making the team this trade makes us worse.
27 Jul 2016 20:47:17
You don't retain a players salary if he is still good. Kane might be bad off the ice, but because of how he plays on the ice buffalo won't retain salary. I think the proposal itself isn't too far off other then the salary.
The New York one is bad, New York gets screwed cap wise because Kunitz's contract is awful.
Into the Wild has no Banter Replies