NHL Trade Rumors Member Posts
Jultz4Norris's Profile
Current Avatar:
Jultz4Norris's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Jultz4Norris's Posts
To Jultz4Norris's last 5 rumours posts
To Jultz4Norris's last 5 banter posts
To Jultz4Norris's last 5 rumour replies
Jultz4Norris's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Jultz4Norris's rumours posts
30 Jan 2016 03:42:44
To EDM: Couture, Vlasic
To SJ: Yakupov, Klefbom
SJ is old and they get younger, EDM gets a couple vets who will help them now.
1.) 30 Jan 2016 04:11:49
I think Couture and Pavelski will be 1-2 centers for years to come in San Jose when big Joe retires. I know Couture can play the wing too but I believe he is a natural center which Edmonton has way too many of. Both Couture and Vlasic are proven players in the league. Yakupov is good when he's got the best player in the world next to him. I don't think Klefbom makes up the difference. San Jose passes.
2.) 30 Jan 2016 04:12:01
That wouldn't even get you Couture OR Vlasic alone. This is absolute garbage. And SJ isn't as old as you say. Martin is the only defenseman we have over age 30 (Burns being 30), we have a young starting goalie and a lot of decently young guys up front (Hertl, Donskoi, Tierney, Couture, etc)
SJ counters with Hall and Draisaitl for Hertl and Braun.
3.) 30 Jan 2016 04:20:12
That WOULD get Vlasic alone. Come down from your high horse there man. No need to over exaggerate that much. That counter is a dumb joke.
I agree San Jose says no to this tho, From an Oilers fan.
4.) 30 Jan 2016 12:30:07
Agreed that would defs get Vlasic but also agreed as it wouldn't get Couture and why would Oilers need him anyway?
5.) 30 Jan 2016 14:28:36
My counter wasn't meant to be realistic, it was an exaggeration because of how bad this is for San Jose. This makes our team significantly worse and makes 0 sense for us to do. If we wanted to get younger why wouldn't we trade some of the OLDER players on the team? (Obviously they wouldn't get this type of return)
6.) 30 Jan 2016 22:51:17
Edmonton wishes.
16 Jan 2016 00:18:50
To ANA: Trouba, Ehlers
To WPG: Fowler, Ritchie.
1.) 16 Jan 2016 02:34:52
Trouba > Fowler
Ehlers > Ritchie
Easy.
2.) 16 Jan 2016 02:42:34
Jets Pass.
14 Jan 2016 21:18:48
To TB: Hudler, 2nd
TO CGY: Drouin.
1.) 15 Jan 2016 00:35:37
Tampa wants a young forward with upside like Drouin or a top-4 RHD with lots of potential. Don't see either of these in this trade. No from Tampa.
2.) 15 Jan 2016 02:16:57
Not even close. Maybe if their first rounder was in the deal instead of the second.
3.) 15 Jan 2016 03:09:04
Cgy doesn't offer anything more thsn this except for a bollig, colborne, or raymond. I feel that given the situation. this sill be another seguin-esque trade.
14 Jan 2016 06:56:09
To TB: Voracek, 1st, Gostisbehere
To PHI: Stamkos, Ohlund
Voracek is going because he sucks this year and needs a change of scenery, the 1st is going for obvious reasons, and Gostisbehere has high bust potential and will be a flash in the pan so Philly should sell high while they still can.
Philly targets Stamkos because they will want to get him before he hits free agency and Ohlund can mentor guys like Del Zotto and Gudas.
1.) 14 Jan 2016 10:01:47
Silly IMO. No from Philly. That rhymed unintentionally.
2.) 14 Jan 2016 12:39:26
You know Ohlund hasn't suited up in years right? He's not mentoring anybody.
3.) 14 Jan 2016 14:06:32
Ok I don't like the flyers but even I know that is a horrible trade. Ya voarcek is having a bad year but it one year. That first could be low depending on where they finish and gostisbehere is a good young defence for what a great player who may not resign and a guy who has not played in years Ya that's a no from Philly.
4.) 14 Jan 2016 17:13:36
Jultz4Norris:
What are the obvious reasons for including the 1st round pick? Why does Ghost have high bust potential and more so than comparable players?
You are utterly clueless for the following reasons:
“Ohlund can mentor guys like Del Zotto and Gudas†– Ohlund hasn’t played in the NHL since 2011. How can he provide any type of mentorship? How do you not know this when proposing a trade?
“Philly targets Stamkos because they will want to get him before he hits free agency†– trading picks and prospects for veterans is the exact opposite of Hextall’s DNA and plan. The Flyers are at best a playoff bubble team – why would they trade for a pending UFA, particularly as one as costly as Stamkos?
“Voracek is going because he sucks this year†– his underlying stats are pretty good and he’s 19th in assists. The Flyers are adjusting to Hakstol’s system and still have an AHL defence. Voracek does not need a change of scenery
“Gostisbehere has high bust potential and will be a flash in the pan†– the guy almost single-handedly won the game for Union at the NCAA finals. For his age and style of play, he’s solid. Ghost will be a core defenceman for the Flyers for years to come
You are also clueless because you think Justin Schultz has top 2 potential, yet you say Ghost has high bust potential? If you want to see a huge bust, look no further than Schultz.
5.) 14 Jan 2016 18:25:06
@Eazy E it stings a little what you said about Schultz but that and everything else you said was pretty spot on.
6.) 16 Jan 2016 08:36:21
@Eazy E is absolutely right.
All of these "reasons" for the Flyers to make this trade are ridiculous
Clueless and a terrible proposal IMO.
Jultz4Norris's banter posts with other poster's replies to Jultz4Norris's banter posts
24 Feb 2016 21:58:38
I think I have a string of trades that could help the Oilers solve their issues.
First,
To NYI: Letestu + 3rd
To EDM: Hamonic
Then,
To WPG: Hamonic
To EDM: Trouba + 1st
Then,
To CGY: Hall, Trouba
TO EDM: Gaudreau
Then,
To NSH: Eberle, Yakupov
To EDM: Josi
Then,
Draft Laine AND Puljujarvi with their pick and Winnipeg's
Then,
Sign Jagr and Backes
Lines then look like this:
Gaudreau-McDavid-Laine
Pouliot-Nugent-Hopkins-Puljuarvi
Hendricks-Draisaitl-Jagr
Korpikoski-Backes-Kassian
Klefbom-Josi
Trouba-Nurse
Davidson-Schultz
Talbot
Brossoit
Suddenly this team looks like a real NHL team. Gets bigger, younger, shakes up the core, and gets great veteran leadership needed for a long deep playoff run next year. Probably a long shot to happen, I know, but I think it's a good plan.
1.) 24 Feb 2016 22:15:50
man you need to come back to reality letestu and a third for hamonic? / lollllllllll.
2.) 24 Feb 2016 22:54:13
Put down the bong immediately and return to reality.
3.) 25 Feb 2016 00:12:59
Trouba and a first for hamonic? Why doesn't Jets just call islanders and go straight up Trouba for Hamonic. This makes zero sense.
4.) 25 Feb 2016 01:00:38
backes as a fourth liner?
5.) 25 Feb 2016 04:18:04
Hahahah so according to you Letestu and a 3rd has the same value as Trouba and a 1st!
6.) 25 Feb 2016 05:37:35
Delusional oilers fans. Your name says it all,
Jultz4abagofpucks.
7.) 25 Feb 2016 12:31:36
You basically just said letestu and 3rd=trouba&top ten pick!
Lol please can you tell me what you were smoking when you posted this? Seriously I would like to know.
11 Feb 2016 02:06:11
Makes sense to me. Kane has obvious character issues so Bowman will probably have to sell low. I doubt Gazzy alone does it but if they threw in a 4th or 5th and maybe a C-level prospect that might get it done. I think Chicago just wants to get rid of this guy and it's a buyers market this year.
30 Jan 2016 03:44:05
Take away retained salary and it's close to good value.
16 Jan 2016 00:21:11
No need for Shattenkirk. Schultz-Klefbom is the future top pairing in the NHL. Edmonton should focus on offense. RNH and Yakupov are underperforming and Hall is playing at an unsustainable pace benefitting from a high PDO.
14 Jan 2016 21:17:14
Close to similar value but Hamonic might be a bit overrated IMO. Both sides would have to add a bit. Maybe a 2nd from Edmonton and a prospect like Barzal from NYI. I think a deal centering around Hamonic and Schultz could work though, but Schultz still has potential. He's being terribly misused right now and is being set up for failure. McLellan can fix him though.
14 Jan 2016 07:23:00
No because Edmonton shouldn't be trading Schultz. He's one of the few guys they have who could turn out to be something. Yes he's struggled but it's too early to give up on him.
Jultz4Norris has no Banter Replies