NHL rumours 7


Use our rumours form to send us nhl trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)

04 Sep 2018 21:42:05
Mtl- byron-shaw-scherbak

Buff- sobotka-girgenson

Agree1 Disagree14

04 Sep 2018 15:27:20
Calgary trades Rasmus Andersson to Toronto for McElhinney, Leivo and a 2nd round pick. Fills needs for both teams.

Agree2 Disagree20

04 Sep 2018 16:09:13
Lol from Calgary.

04 Sep 2018 17:04:11
Fills calgary's need for ahl players?

04 Sep 2018 18:14:48
Fills the need of a qualified back up netminder for the oft injured Smith. And Leivo is just as good and if not better than the players currently on the Flames 4th line.

04 Sep 2018 22:23:56
take out the second and this gets you stone.

add a first if you want rasmus.

04 Sep 2018 23:40:33
Lol? Wasnt Andersson a 2nd round pick? he's a stud now even though he hasn't really played in the nhl?

04 Sep 2018 23:32:15
Don’t see it actually filling eithers needs because leafs need a for sure NHL Dman tonpkay good in his own zone. I’m not convinced 100% that’s Andersson . Easy no from Calgary though because he has potential to be a good impact player and the pieces going the other way don’t. Leafs take the deal and run, just don’t think it solves the problem they have right now. They have high potential Dmen in the system.

04 Sep 2018 23:39:03
And wasnt Andersson a 2nd rounder? So they get a similar pick back plus one of the best back up options from last year plus a decent 3rd or 4th line player. didn't realize he was the second coming of Nik Lidstrom all the sudden.

04 Sep 2018 23:49:33
Leivo wouldn't crack calgary's line up, who would you take out? Calgary has to many players on one way contracts so they need to ship out a couple roster players, andersson is 2 way so he's not the guy their going to trade.

05 Sep 2018 04:52:16
If Brower could crack the lineup lievo could.

05 Sep 2018 16:23:47
Well Brower was bought out so obviously not cracking flames roster, they signed and traded for better players this offseason. Vbb, who would you take out of calgary's lineup that leivo would replace since that other guy couldn't answer the question.

05 Sep 2018 20:15:30
Well top 9 is pretty set. But projected lines that I see have a furth line of Derek Ryan centring Curtis Lazar and a spot that has been vacated by brouwers buyout. So I’d say there’s a RW spot for him there, and I’d take him over Lazar as well. Unless these websites and I am missing someone, which could be the case, I’d say he cracks flames lineup.

05 Sep 2018 20:20:38
And saying Brouwer was bought out so that means he couldn’t crack the roster isn’t exactly correct. He couldn’t crack the roster as a $4+mill player is fair to say. If Brouwer was making $2 mill or less he would have a spot on just about any team in the leagues bottom 6. And since Leivo is making just about league minimum, he would have a spot on 90% of the leagues bottom 6 also, unfortunately not the one team that actually has him.

05 Sep 2018 21:34:15
I knew that and I’d replace the guy who is replacing Brouwer with Lievo.

06 Sep 2018 03:44:40
Gudreau-monahan-neal Tkachuk-backlund-frolik bennet-lindholm-hathaway czarnick-ryan-lazar/ jankowski. I suppose leivo could beat out Lazar/ jankowski 4th line but think Lazar is better suited for a 4th line guy but doubt he beats out those two and Hathaway, but I could be wrong. Think he's better than lazar but for the role I think you'd want leivo playing style in the top 9.

06 Sep 2018 17:43:05
Donscherry thinks zetterberg or or Gilmore would be worth 7th round draft picks when about to enter their primes, doesn't matter where you were drafted, matters how you progress. Andersson was a 2nd round pick but maybe by the end a lot of teams will be saying they shoulda taken him top half of the 1st, or maybe never established himself but right now is a pretty good prospect with high potential.

06 Sep 2018 17:48:13
Hey Shoots, i could of responded but when you make a ridiculous statement like "AHL players", its not really worth a response. McElhinney was one of the best backups in the league last year. Leivo can't make one of the deepest offences in the sport but he succeeded in the AHL and ecery time he was given playing time in Toronto. Like Jim said. I take him over Lazar and whoever would be your 4th line RW. Leivo also has the ability to move up the lineup in case of injury.
But let's see how the Flames do when the inevitable injury happens to Smith.
Also wasnt Andersson a 2nd round choice? I offered that in return plus pieces that help the Flames. If you are going to make an argument, at least make it a reasonable one. Andersson is not the 2nd coming of Lidstrom, he profiles as a 3-6 dman nothing more.

10 Sep 2018 12:24:34
That trade makes no sense, first of all draft position doesn't mean anything. All that means as a junior player teams thought you had a chance of being a star. So by saying 2nd round player for second player doesn't mean squat. I'm sure any team now would trade a 4th round pick for Gaudreau. Calgary doesn't need a older back up goalie they need to figure out if any they have will be Smith replacement. You guys might thing leivo is a good trade to us, if Calgary puts Andersson on the trade block the return will be a lot higher than that

10 Sep 2018 12:25:11
You guys that keep saying 2nd round player for 2nd player that means absolutely nothing. Draft is where teams think how good you are at that time. Ask any team now I bet all day long they trade a 4th rounder for Gaudreau I would even bet most would trade their first round. Yes Calgary needs a back up but not a 35 year old guy we need one of the young ones to step up and take that role.Leivo might be a decent prospect but if Calgary puts Andersson on the market the return would be a lot higher than that. Even if he only become 2nd pairing Dman the value is a lot higher than a bottom 6 forward.

12 Sep 2018 09:21:22
So what exactly has Andersson proven in the NHL to get such a high return? He is projected at a 2nd pairing dman at best. And by the way, Gaudreau IS A PROVEN nhler, Andersson is not so your comparison sucks. When Andersson proves himself in the Nhl then you cab argue.

18 Sep 2018 01:51:49
LMAO my comparison sucks? You are saying Andersson was a 2nd so here's a old ass goalie a player you don't need and a 2nd round draft pick. When Gaudreau was drafted no one though his potential was this high, drafting is luck unless you get the rare time like Crosby, OV or McDavid. So unless you have a crystal ball to determine Andersson potential no GM in their right mind would take the trade you offered. A 2nd line dman is worth a hell of a lot more than a 35 year old back up a bottom 6 forward and a 2nd round pick and if Toronto finishes where everyone thinks they can you might as well call that a 3rd round pick.

18 Sep 2018 01:56:28
And I never said the value of Andersson I said he's worth more as a potential 2nd line dman. With saying that how do you think the players your offering are worth anything? 35 year old back up goalie might get you a year or 2, Leivo had what 22 points in 55 games? That doesn't mean he's proven and a 2nd round pick that could just mean you get another AHL player.

04 Sep 2018 15:19:16
Mtl: Gallagher

Devils: Zacha

Devils gets a good winger to complemented Hischier and hall and mtl gets a good young center to rebuild

Agree3 Disagree10

05 Sep 2018 21:31:55
No from MTL, we're not losing our heart for that.

03 Sep 2018 22:12:08
Jackets trade: Panarin, Murray

Islanders trade: Lee, Pulock

What do you guys think?

Agree1 Disagree17

04 Sep 2018 02:10:57

04 Sep 2018 03:56:14
Wtf is your problem even posting this.

04 Sep 2018 03:56:28
Lol sorry was rude there. This is just bad.

04 Sep 2018 14:54:58
thats pretty close I like it, especially the part where lee+pulock wouldn't even get you panarin much less adding murray.

04 Sep 2018 21:20:43
columbus downgrades in both positions, although you already knew that didn't you.

05 Sep 2018 04:36:22
Actually they don't downgrade on defence pulock is a way better piece then murray.

03 Sep 2018 17:16:27
At the deadline

DAL: Seguin
WPG: 1st Round Pick 2019, Petan, Nogier


OTT: Duschene
WPG: 1st Round Pick 2019, Comrie

Agree1 Disagree10

03 Sep 2018 18:47:19
Bruh first of all you’re a homer if you think either of those trades will work and have you heard of salary cap before.

03 Sep 2018 19:03:53
The Jets would do neither trade as signing these two players after this season would be very hard as Winnipeg have Wheeler, Trouba, Connor, Laine, Myers, Tanev and Charoit to re-sign next season. There is only so much money available and both Seguin and Duchene would want way too much $ and that would put the Jets in cap troubles. The Jets trade would be giving up way too much of their future for what would be rental players.

03 Sep 2018 19:47:30
To much of their future for seguin/ duchene. Really are you joking. A late first plus petan who is a bust and nogier who was injured most of last year. Or Comrie who will at most be the backup for the next few years and I'm still not completely sold on him.
Ottawa and Dallas say no.

03 Sep 2018 20:22:13
Islandjet I’m not going to be rude here but jets are literally giving up essentially nothing in either trade and the only “future” is the 1st round pick. If jets could actually acquire either player at this cost and they don't make that trade then I’ll be lost for words. Adding one of those players can improve their cup chances drastically and the fact you wouldn’t make this trade blows my mind.

03 Sep 2018 21:20:15
AJO1 I have to give you props for having the guts to post trade proposals knowing that most likely you won't have anyone think that they are fair trades. Good for you on doing it.

04 Sep 2018 02:41:09
A late first and b-c prospects for top line players and jets say no?! Lol insane.

04 Sep 2018 03:48:58
DUCHENE . its really not that hard to spell .

04 Sep 2018 03:57:54
How does it take guts to post a dumb trade lol.

02 Sep 2018 20:56:21
DAL: Panarin, Bobrovsky
CBJ: Seguin, Bishop.

Agree0 Disagree14

02 Sep 2018 23:10:58
If Panarin and Seguin are pretty Close.
Goalie Bob is still much much better than bishop.
CLB says no.

03 Sep 2018 05:41:28
C>>W I’d say this isn’t bad but no from Dallas as Hanzel would become their 1C. Paniran would be their 2nd line LW.

04 Sep 2018 15:14:00
Centers are worth more then winters.

02 Sep 2018 04:43:59
- Duchene

- Petry
- '19 1st

Agree5 Disagree16

02 Sep 2018 14:06:49
Sorry habs aren’t in a position to trade there first as it’s likely a top 10 pick and if Petry is going to be traded it will be for prospects and picks.

02 Sep 2018 16:01:57
Montreal shouldn't trade any first rounders for about 5 years I think.
I think this is going to be the one of the darker periods in Habs history for the next few seasons.

03 Sep 2018 20:11:44
Nope sorry we're keeping our 1st rounders.

02 Sep 2018 02:07:30

Minn- koivu-erikkson ek -parise

Mtl- buy out parise 2 or 3 year from now

Agree1 Disagree15

02 Sep 2018 14:09:36
How does this make sense for either team, habs want to rebuild so let’s trade our biggest trade chip for older guys on bad contracts? And Min doesn’t need wingers if Neno can rebound this year.

02 Sep 2018 16:14:24
Ek Erickson=older guy on bad contract? Lol what?

03 Sep 2018 02:22:07
Sorry I really meant parise and Koivu, ek is nice but not enough future in the package for patch.

31 Aug 2018 23:41:45
Canucks gaudette 1 rd pick kole lind 2 rd pick dahlen sutter

Mtl max domi johnathan drouin

Mtl max patchs

Oiler 1 rd pick sekra 3 rd pick

Canadians draft jack hughes and a couple of d guy withen 3 years they well be making the playoff

Domi horvat boeser
Drouin petterson virtanen
Sven gagner erikson
Russel beagle schaller
Edler stecher
Joulevi tanev
Pouliot guddy

Agree1 Disagree21

01 Sep 2018 00:03:14
If you are in the sites fantasy league and you knew how Finest has started to switch to a Canucks fan then reading the grammar of this post you could easily conclude this is Finest’s new account so welcome back Finest.

01 Sep 2018 01:31:48
Damn, hell no from Vancouver. 3 of our best prospects, a 1st, 2nd and Sutter for Drouin and Domi? I seriously hope this was a joke post, if not you’re delusional.

I wouldn’t even do Dahlen and Gaudette straight up for Domi and Drouin.

01 Sep 2018 06:00:25
Hahahaha holy this is so brutal.

31 Aug 2018 06:33:30
Blue jackets: Panarin

Rangers: Chytil + Hajek + 2nd


Agree13 Disagree14

31 Aug 2018 15:30:12
When he apparently only wants to go to a cpl cities, that limits the ask. And if you know he is coming back next year, that’s not terrible. However he doesn’t have a NTC and another team may be okay trading for him for a single year and be able to offer more.

31 Aug 2018 16:47:53
He apperently really wants to be a NYR anyways. I do t think NYT should trade their best prospect for one year of him then probably resign him anyways.
The other cities/ teams Panarin is interested in is said to be NYI, TB, FLO, DAL, LAK. I actually think the Rangers will sign him as a UFA myself for some reason.

31 Aug 2018 18:03:48
Jim if another team trades better quality for a year of Panarin yikes for that team haha but I know what you’re saying and ya yup I guess he could sign next year as a UFA that’s very true.

31 Aug 2018 19:41:47
Yeah, obviously paying more than this for one year of service would be risky as hell. But it’s 2 good, not great, prospects and a 2nd rounder. For an elite point per game Player who is still only like 25 or 26, it’s possible someone pony’s up more.

31 Aug 2018 23:26:48
Rangers are rebuilding, why would they do this?

31 Aug 2018 23:31:44

Actually, Chytils highly regarded as of now. he's ranked as the rangers #1 prospect by some, even over Andersson (which i find surprising), despite the fact that he was a reach in the 2017 draft. I think he's a solid prospect, and imo this deal woukd be more than enough to get Panarin. Idk if anyone woukd be willing to pony up more than this for the single yesr tho.

01 Sep 2018 00:16:12
I’m sorry but this is dumb Chytil is one of the top prospects in the nhl and the rangers are no where near contention. Yes it makes sense from a Paniran POV as long term he wants to be a ranger. But the reality is the blue Jackets are a contender and could use Paniran as their own rental for a cup run while the rangers will be in the race for Jack Hughes. In the 2019 offseason the rangers as of right now will acquire Paniran via UFA but if you believe the rangers will trade for Panarin especially without a extension you don’t know what you’re talking about. Value wise Chytil is not a prospect you trade for a rental.


NHL Trade Rumors

NHL Trade Rumors 2

NHL Trade Rumors 3

NHL Trade Rumors 4

NHL Trade Rumors 5

NHL Trade Rumors 6

NHL Trade Rumors 8

NHL Trade Rumors 9

NHL Trade Rumors 10

Log In or Register to post

Remember me

Forgot Pass